Tried to spin to a question? I asked you a question. Another in a long line of questions you've been asked in here and never gave an answer. No fùcking idea why you brought Blair into it. More nonsensical shìte from you.
You may have to at some point, Mick makes money from transients passing through (they get all the ads which pay for the site). You won't get many making repeat visits if all they see is 2 or 3 pages of spam.
True, it is absurd. Can you imagine coming onto this tread as a visitor and finding pages and pages of spam? Would it really entice you to come back for more
Hmmm ... you keep whinging about it but are constantly here ... the exception that proves the rule? Plus it's way more amusing than the Saxpest's homage to all things Daily Mail was ... now that really was tedious spamming with absolutely no saving grace ...
I am already a member mate, if i had any inclination this was the norm i would have looked further afield. Saxton posted from many, varied news outlets around the country and were all valid so where you get the Daily Mail **** from is beyond me (do you read it on a regular basis?) All we get at the moment is some thick twat with no opinion of his own c&ping ****e he thinks is funny from twitter (seemingly without understanding some of them). This is a discussion forum for people to "discuss", not a place for some ****er to post other ****ers inane ****e. if you have something to say, say it. If not keep quiet.
You've just confirmed what I said you dopey sod. You tried your usual tactic of not actually answering, but asking a question to try to change the point you were supposedly responding to, and then trying to claim it's the other person not answering. Thick and transparent is quite a look on you. .
It's a tactic they've used to close similar threads several times in safespace. The fact they follow us here to repeat it, having got us banned from there, means that this thread is a monument to their fear and stupidity, and moderator incompetence. If this thread is a monstrosity, it's due to incompetent mods enabling petulant ****wits. They've been asked to debate many, many times, and been found wanting almost every time. On the odd occasion a conversation does break out, they panic and the piffle rate increases to disrupt it. It often gets flagged up at the time as it is so obvious. Pumpey threatening to close a thread the dopey **** stickied because of the alternatives that Duncan created sums up his low level of thinking, Oh, and it's worth noting that Pete being banned, and the spammer still here, is more a sign of Pumpey being hung out to dry, as he doesn't have ban powers.
^^^^ getting up early to post his same old tired bullshit. What’s todays plan champ, going to read a few headlines then return to attempt to astound us with your supposed knowledge on the subject? Let me give you a bit of advice…go beyond the headline so that the first question thrown back at you, doesn’t end up with you having to try and wriggle out of it, using the same tired old bullshit you try to claim is debate
^^^^^ Only tried posting an opinion once, and that was ten years ago, and he made such an arse of himself, he's spent the next ten years following us around posting inane, petulant drivel like that in the hope someone gives him a virtual hug.
I doubt that he got up early. Judging from the bulk of his posts he briefly came round from his alcoholic coma after imbibing whatever the tincture of choice is in that ****hole that he occupies up there in the East Riding. Maybe been eating too much of the poisoned fish that is being produced by De Pfeffel's Freeport excavations. Never mind he's back in his coma slumped in the corner of his hovel surrounded by the detritus of Brexit.
I asked you at least 4 questions yesterday. You failed to answer any of them. You also failed to show any evidence of your imbecilic assertion that Scotland has no currency. The only question you asked in your equally imbecilic rant about asylum seekers living in hotels was is it value for money and what would Labour do. Me being far from a supporter of the Labour Party can't answer that question. Mainly because I don't give a fùck what Labour would do. This your default setting. Make stupid statements then avoid answering any questions on your stupid statements and just prattle on about them they we and us. You're a braindead fùckwit that's never had an original thought ever begging for people to be In your gang. Pretty sad tbh.
