To be fair, Brum were won all but one of their league games in October (the other was drawn), and were unbeaten in the Europa League as well so I can see why Hughton won it
Manager of the month, not team of the month... Not saying I disagree, just that it shouldn't be down to who got the best results because that isn't just the manager.
Is it? I'd have thought the panel would look at all of the results of the month?? ISPLT - isn't it always the manager of the team of the month that gets the award? People above were saying the Tigers had great results in October so wondered what NP had to do to win it. Not saying it's right, but that's what seems to happen to me
Yes, but it shouldn't be. Tickler and I have discussed it above in more detail but basically it should include the squad available and money spent etc.
I wouldn't disagree with you. I think I raised a similar point in last month's thread when NP was nominated.