I think he realised he had to improve, playing regularly has helped his confidence as well, we’ve no choice but to play him due to shortage of numbers. This season on the whole he’s played as well as any of the defenders
That’s taken out of context, I was saying these are his strengths, but his weaknesses out way his strengths.
Sometimes John you could argue with yourself,!! read the posts again their meaning is perfectly clear
Why would you offer him a new contract? Once Kalas is fit it will be a defence of Klose, Atkinson and Klose. Vyner will be on the bench at best.
When does Kalas contract run out?, is he likely to resign, bearing in mind we’ll not offer him anywhere near what he’s on now
I sometimes worry about you, you missed the point as well different interpretations of the "presented"
we are talking Bents! I agree with what you say on your original POST Bents like everyone has strengths and weaknesses and I agree, then you tell me I am out of context what so you are saying wrong to agree with you ...
The thrust of the post was his weaknesses outweigh his strengths, you highlighted the strengths and said you agreed with them. That’s why I said you point was out of context.
Supposed to be back soon just before WC Runs out this year. I think he will take what’s offered like Andi did. Unless he has a great WC (don’t even now if Czech qualified) but I think he will stay. If not his wages will be freed up to allow us to source a replacement.
I would have thought with your love spat with Ashton, regarding the point, that you never really allude to any facts. Just ramble on like we’re supposed to understand the point. And the worse thing is, it is without doubt you’re knowledgable but you ruin it by talking like the rest understand what’s going on inside your head.
Have a look at their goal, positioning ? He just jumped under the ball. His weight of passing beggars belief. Absolute liability. If he has any use, it's in their box. Certainly not ours.
I thought Klose was more to blame for their goal tbh? I watched the highlights reel this morning, and all theit good chances came from errors by Klose. Given his lack of game time he can be forgiven. Against better forward lines he would have cost us big time last night.
humour on a different level .. 2 or 3 times a week I spend with 3 different groups of friends but all 3 groups are friends anyway just doing different projects they are tedious at best but fruitful when the end result is a positive. Banter and joking about each other or comments / ribbing on ability to not manage something are a standard evenings achievement ... often continues in the pub where ribbing and banter may extend outside the group. I must apologise if the "attempts" at humour on here fall on deaf ears or get mis read. ...... As a "practicing scholar " of morse code I have because using it is minimalistic and recipient tends to know the "short sentence" stopped missing out words and being more "full sentenced" seems like I need to do something similar for attempts at bantering / joking over spelling errors...... lifes to short to be to serious
Cannot agree Klose was in anyway responsible for their goal unless he gave the initial foul away for the free kick, I can't remember. As for Klose he is better than Vyner but that is a very low bar to be judged on. I do agree with your last sentence.
Our keeper had to make a vital save because Klose was too late in the tackle...that was one I did notice... I believe Vyner would have be crucified on here had it been him.. https://fb.watch/g8X8hRno1d/
And in the first half he let their CF muscle in front of him and knock the ball on for the volley that went narrowly over.... As I say, he is rusty, so he can be forgiven; other defenders wouldn't be given that luxury on here...
