I'll say this in Harry and Meghan's favour. Their initial popularity, visiting Australia, Africa etc, shook the Cambridges from their cosy, rather insular way of life. They are now looking outwards to the public and world in general, and their star is rising. Harry and Meghan come across as precious and purely self-serving.
I still am amazed that people make it their mission to keep going on about these two. Don’t they have more interesting things to do with their life? Maybe helping out a food bank or helping the elderly would be more useful to society.
It's about a powerful woman, who wants to set up an alternative royal family in the US, and apparently has ambitions to be the Democratic candidate for President of the United States. So, for some, it's interesting to get behind the glossy write-ups in celebrity mags and photoshopped pics to see the real person. If all this bothers you, SW, don't read this thread!
I gave up my Twitter account after realising that whole platform is just evil and I kept reading how awful they were. I now think if we ignore them completely they’ll just go away.
I apologise for intervening in your obsession Goldie. I would never want to devalue your socio-economic drive to keep only one Royal Family in this world. Though well done to her for her capitalist ideas on expansion into the US of our Royal Family. I wonder if she could get a Buck Palace V.2 in LA?
Delighted you are fighting her corner, SW, though I doubt your royal franchise idea will catch. Still, if she becomes POTUS, she'll have a big, white house to live in. PS Do please post more of the same to give some balance. Strolls is a Meghanite too, so you're in good company
Woke Harry announces he has three dogs. What are they? Alsations, Dalmations, Spanials? No, they're Emotional Support dogs. Jeez...
Royal on the next series of I’m a celebrity on ice island got talent get me something something Surely not appropriate? Could you imagine if it was …..
