natural isnt it. I think most people have no issue with a 15 year old boy with an adult female. Switch that round and it's pretty sick
It cost each of us about 24 pence to pay the 12 mill for Prince Andrew. 24 pence!! Some bare greedy ****s on this board.
I said drop me out on the technicalities pls. If you're 50 plus and you're shaggin a 17 year old youre a fukin **** i dont give a ****e what any law says mate. And your assumption that the other way round is okay. Its not.
good quesi, some last minute spamming of the board before i **** off on holiday on weds also no footie so this is what we have resorted to
Been away so not commented on here so don't want to repeat too much as probably already been said. But, the more you watch and the more they drone on, the more ludicrous that the idea a family that originally would have self proclaimed itself as Royal should 'rule' over us becomes. It's just a preposterous idea in the modern world. The Queen was the Queen, most of us respected her and admire what's she's done. That'll change with Charles and, when he doesn't last too long, the idea that William be a ****ing King will be largely laughed at I'd think. They'll be phased out over the next couple of decades, to nothing more than token figureheads. And the tourists will still come anyway, so that won't change. Make all the Palaces and stuff National Trust.
Charity starts at home mate, soz. Enjoy your holiday, leave some Bobbyd truth bombs before you go though yeah?
Said as much yday. Some absolute weapons on here think people actually visit the uk for a chance to actually see a royal. Make more money off them (the royals) by opening up all the palaces and grounds and charging the tourists to enter
It's more than that. Ppl don't just support or show their indifference to the monarchy at the moment for those reasons alone. What we've had is a queen who came through the second world war, been there as a child and then become the head of state, been coronated live on TV for the first time to a global audience, reigned over the country throughout pretty much everyone's lifetime. People have been born, lived a lifetime and died during her reign. That's pretty huge and indoctrinating in a way. One thing that'll change any of that is as time passes and generations move on and that connection disappears as it eventually will. I doubt it'll be with Charles as the very same royalists who were crying for him to be sidelined for William were the ones lining the streets cheering Charlie on yesterday. It may not even be William after that as it's not about royalty but the personalities and he's generally well liked. It's the distinction between the individual and the monarchy that makes any difference to the wider public. The mourning for Diana's death showed that as much as it does for the queen. So it'll likely be a combination of both that will bring it about. I find it weird watching sychophants fawn over them or defend their existence simply on the basis of birth right tbh but they literally mean nothing to me.
