When you get goals disallowed because somebody's armpit was offside you know the offside rule has gone to ****!
Saying its only offside when there is clear daylight between defender and attacker would still require a drawn line, but it would be a lot simpler
It doesn't matter what they do they'll have people saying it was unfair.. Move the line fwd half a yard and they'll say the same thing when it's tight.
Clear daylight is too much.. Offsides are fine imo and so are overturned reds and no contact dives for pens. VAR is good for many things but people have forgotten about that kind of thing. The days of losing to goals 2 yards off ended
No offence but you are talking absolute ****e here. "To turn that into us being ****ed over for the last 5 games in a row is very different though." We were ****ed yesterday and the 5 games before that, that is a fact, the incidents have already been listed, we are taking every incident in isolation.
He's saying we are complaining about yesterday and using that to also complain about the last 5 games as if nothing went against us in those games, rubbish.
What were the decisions that’s ****ed you over v city, us and Brighton? the wolves one I’m guessing you think the shirt pull? That’s 50/50 I’d say. You see people grab shirts all the time, what would say is they let go quickly and it didn’t disadvantage the Newcastle player, but could have been given.
Foul that led to Wolves goal was soft as **** but no one mentions that. City Stones elbowed Schar in the head and we didn't get the pen. Against you the added time is my main gripe, if you were winning there's just not a chance that goes to 98 minutes, i think deep down you know that not that you need to admit it. Brighton Wilson goal got chalked off for a high boot even though his boot was no where near the head of the opposing player.
