Against City we should have had a penalty, but if there was an agenda against us then Tripp's red wouldn't have been overturned. Against Wolves we should have had a penalty, but if there was an agenda against us then Schar would have seen red. Against Liverpool the offside was harsh, but it was marginal and you see that happening to every team. The extra time added was correct under the laws of the game, but annoying because it isn't applied consistently. In all of the games we can't know what would have happened if those decisions had gone for us because it changes the game. We could have gone on to win or we could have faced a comeback, losing momentum and ultimately losing the game. All ifs, buts and maybes. The poor decisions need to stop but we have to take better control of our own destiny.
He was a yard ahead of the defender and was an inch away from an overhead kick. It was offside. You don’t have to touch the ball to be offside. Maybe you need to go read up on the rules before moaning decisions being given in that case?
I think both decisions were correct, but it sparked plenty of debate and opinion was split on each one. The decisions went our way.
Yes so obvious they took over 2 minutes to decide eh. Typical scouser thinks he’s a clever dick. You do realise that there has been 4 dodgy calls this weekend. Oh and Virgil should have been sent off aswell.
Trippiers was a cynical yellow, not dangerous, not a red. Schar managed to miss the blokes shin, how is that a red. The ones that have went "in our favour" weren't reds anyway.
Yeah, my point was just that both sparked debate and there were arguments both ways. In the end both decisions went for us (correctly I believe).
I'm not disagreeing with you. I also think they weren't red. There were plenty of people on both side of the argument for each one though, so they weren't clear cut and they went our way.
1. Wilson no foul v Brighton 2. Schar non pen v City 3. Longstaff shirt pull v Wolves 4. Build up to Wolves goal came from a soft as **** free kick. 5. Isak level. 6. 8 minutes added. 7. Yesterdays OG. Even if we say we were lucky with Trips and Schar which we weren't, we are still 5 decisions down. I haven't even mentioned Tranmere. It can all **** off.
Im not a scouser… I’m from Brighton. they took 4 minutes because they had to draw the lines.. that’s the formality. But because there was a Leicester player directly behind the Brighton player it made it harder to formally draw the lines. doesn’t make it any less offside because you could see with the naked eye, the Brighton player was ahead. Ps, week 1. Fulham fouled henderson but allowed play to go on and they scored. Goal 2, iffy penalty given against vvd after mitro managed to Swan dive after minimal contact. Week 3, rashford given onside when looked off against United. few years ago? Firmino given offside when they drew the lines from his armpit? another one against Leicester wben player was given onside despite them drawing the line from the shadow of of firmino’s boot, not his actual boot. All teams get given them for and against. Every fan is just blinded by their loyalty and think all the contentious decisions go against them. And other teams get more for them. trippier red card,,, schar potential red card, the ‘push’ on Fraser that has happened a few times earlier in the game that weren’t fouls. I’m guessing that time you got the only unbiased var ref or was it that that var ref hates wolves more than you guys?
I don’t think you can compare them one’s mind. The calls against us, especially yesterdays was appalling.
Yea so i can't agree with you saying we should be doing better as a team/club. Mid table isn't that bad with the fixtures and if rules are applied properly we are sitting at least 5th, we've been excellent.
You defending what happened yesterday on Willock? Last week Isaks goal against your lot again didn’t look offside. We have had 5/6 already this season stopping us scoring goals. Blatent mistakes/corruption. I will be watching Liverpools games closely and I will come back when one goes against you. Let’s see Klopp lose his ****. And he will.
Wolves also had a goal disallowed by VAR for a foul in the build up. We do get some decisions go for us, but we have also had some clear and obvious ones go against us.
Because it WAS a foul man, even non NUFC commentators/pundits said it was a clear push I'm talking about WRONG decisions, kin ell.
After watching the match yesterday and seeing the ref going over to the monitor and watching the slow motion etc there was only one thing I didn’t get The var didn’t show the view from the east stand to the ref???? If he had been showed that view it would/ could have been very different outcome So the question should have been why wasn’t all views presented to the ref?? Unfortunately doing away with var is not the solution, at least at the minute you will have video of what went wrong and hope to embarrass those var refs or at least improve/ make as consistent as possible I’m not a conspiracy theorist but my god if it’s meant to even up over a season we’ve got that coming in spades
