Yes, we've spent the entire transfer window signing young talent so we're going to sign a Chelsea reject on huge wages. Makes perfect sense.
He didn’t even start in their one striker formation when they didn’t have a single recognised striker. And they have now brought one in. This seems like a foolish decision on his part but no doubt a lucrative one Unless they are changing tactics or manager but that doesn’t seem likely in the short term Best of luck to him I guess
**** move from him, although I’m sure he’s earning plenty. He needs to go on loan somewhere he will play every week.
You said that we'd sign between 0-11 players, and if you include the two Spurs kids, we signed 12. Fraud!
Just watched this and Mr Caleta-Car has caused my Mrs to swoon, so handsome and chiseled is he. The last time she was all of a fluster like this was when we signed Graziano, and the time before that was, well, never. She has stated confidently that we've won the transfer window
So, so laughable! Show your credentials/ your balls & do it a month ago not when the selling potential has gone down the preverbial (shijjer).
Actually getting on the pitch from off the bench has probably swayed him. No different than being here to be honest. Good luck to him. Very thankful we had him could turn out like Kane in the end who had loan spells then exploded.
Exactly. Got on, had a header saved. And it’s not like Aubamayang is anything other than a short term solution for Chelsea. Clearly he feels he has a future there
Different opinion but there you go. 6 year deal with a top4/6 EPL club - potentially easy decision. Doesn’t play (much), gets paid. gets a medal.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxence_Lacroix Fun trivia note if we did ever sign Maxence Lacroix. He’s born in Villeneuve-St. Georges, which is twinned with Eastleigh.
I am intrigued by these links to Barkley on a free. Arguably we do need more bodies in midfield if we are going to mainly be playing three there We have Lavia, JWP, Diallo, AMN and Aribo. But the concern would be wages and contract length. It would be risk to give him more than two years based on recent efforts. I think we would need Redmond to move on to free up the wages? Because I'd guess that despite getting the wages of Forster, Long, Broja, Bednarek, all or most of Stephens off the wage bill I still think our overall wage bill has likely increased due to the number of signings (or at the very least is the same)
