£60m rejected for Gordon. Will be a record for a home grown player if a deal is agreed, no sell on needing to be paid. Beating the deals for Kukaku and Stones. To be fair, stones only cost £1.5m and sold to city on the cheap when you look at what he has helped them win.
Why in gods name they're rejecting that is another example of how useless your owners are. OK the lad can play a bit, but he's only Evertons almiron and has no end product whatsoever.
Yeah, TT must be crazy spending up to £75m on Fofana and whatever Everton agree on Gordon. To be fair, the Fofana deal is inflated due to original buy price and %sell on owed by Leicester.
I hope these players signing for Chelsea are happy with their terms for the length of their contract. Apparently they are going American style with young players on long contracts. But that means the players aren’t going to have a lot of say even in 3 or 4 years time - Harry Kane style
Listen. Prick. I don't know who you are or what your motives for posting on this board are, but stick to dissing other posters and leave the Daily Star out of this. It's been my paper of choice for decades, the page 3 women are superb.
Is this a serious question? Because for the same price you are getting at least twice the player. Although i guess it wouldn’t be the same price because Gordon’s wages will be a lot lower
@Spurlock Gregory doesn’t have an avatar. Can’t remember the rules. Outright ban or ignore until it sorts its life out?
