"EDF was not “a state owned energy company” as it is listed on the stock exchange in Paris." What you posted. Did you specify when EDF was not a state owned energy company? No you didn't. But that doesn't matter though does it because EDF is and always has been a state owned energy company you utter spaz. The French government have an 84% stake in it, soon to be 100%. This means they control it. They own it and they decide how it operates. What is it you don't get about that, does it task your feeble brain too much. Is there not enough boring repetitive shìt in these facts so you can't relate?
It's pretty clear really. They have split the UK from the EU and sewn the seeds of a potential trade war in the bloc. As a bonus we have the nearest thing to civil war in Britain that we have seen for three and a half centuries. Tbh if I saw a Brexitard drowning on my daily walk along the beach I'd just wave back.
'The mewling pencil', James O'Brien aptly coined him. The absolute epitome of the Emperor's New Clothes, I remember him best on Daily Politics a few years back when he was droning on in some false sense of authority and knowledge about how GATT 24 was going to solve all the problems of NI trade borders. Next thing, surprise guest Lorand Bartels, professor of trade law at Cambridge pops up and asks him to specify where GATT 24 says it'll do what he claims. Mewling Pencil furiously scrolls through his phone and says he's found it and reads out a bit to which Bartels responds 'Yes, that presumes you have an agreement. If you have an agreement then you don't need GATT 24 - if you don't have an agreement, you can't use GATT 24 anyway: it's totally inappropriate in the context of this situation'. Tbf, Andrew Neil eviscerated both Boris and james Delingpole on the same topic when he tested their knowledge on the claims they were making, almost with tears in his eyes as a Brexiteer, because he knew himself that these chancers had no ****ing idea what they were doing. And that's it with Mogg - press him and his knowledge on any subject is shown to be superficial and opaque, but he's the peasants' idea of what their masters should look and sound like.
