Pretty easy to work out by the location. The one with guards on the gate, forests around, and the son of one of The Great Leader's mates from when he was at The Times lurking outside filming him after shimmying over a wall Yeah, on the subject of Durham Police needing to investigate things...
So a reporter did his job? Was they only at that location once? Last bit was a serious question since i really don't know if they were there for a single reason or a standard visit of constituencies.
No reporter was involved. James Delingpole's son took the video and passed it onto Lawrence Fox, who posted it.
No, a reporter did not do their job, for the following reasons 1.) They aren't a reporter, they are the son of a reporter 2.) As lockdown measures had been lifted, there was absolutely no reason to film Starmer other than being a creepy weirdo 3.) As the story died when Guido Blog broke it last year, there was no purpose to it Also, it can be proven that Starmer was there once simply by looking at his itinerary for that week - which begs the question how the son of one of The Great Leader's old chums happened to know what the itinerary was, which would suggest that somebody in the press leaked it because there's no reason for somebody who isn't a journalist to be skulking outside with their phone filming nothing of note
Better look for that one tribe member deep in the Bornean jungle to see if they're surprised by this as well...
Yeah my **** up, didn't read this bit correctly one of The Great Leader's mates from when he was at The Times Missed The son of bit
Delingpole Snr also attended Oxford at the same time as Bodger, coincidentally. His son claimed that he just happened to see it and was offended. Bullshitting runs in the family, apparently. please log in to view this image It's not a road you'd want to walk down at night, if you look it up. Very narrow, very little lighting and no real view of the hall. The filming was clearly done from very short range too, as you can see if you watch it. It's a non-story, but the background is fairly revealing.
For a little colour, it's also worth noting that Dellingpole Sr was on the anti-mask grift a couple of years ago who would routinely post photos like these whenever he was in a supermarket in 2020 please log in to view this image Probably worth suggesting there were additional reasons he should wear a mask in public...
https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/25/poli...ersonality-pleads-guilty-january-6/index.html And this is what I'm talking about. Here are some truths a better education...or anything resembling an education, really...would have taught you. 1. Because a bunch of your buddies are gung ho about doing something does not make it legal. 2. Doing illegal things may result in you getting punished. 3. That may becomes a will if you film it. 4. That will becomes a definitely will if you post what you film. 5. Not just for you, but for your buddies. 6. With friends like you, who needs enemies? 7. When you break the law, film it, post it, then plead guilty to the criminal behavior you've immortalized, you can cry all you want about it being the government's fault, and some people may pretend to believe you. The truth is that it's because you're a stupid f***. A really, really stupid f***.
Hope's such a ****er. The numbers are checked? No, they aren't. She just told you that she's on it, you twat!
please log in to view this image Paul, Gabbard and Greenwald definitely are. Not particularly familiar with the other three. I'm not sure if this image is from Fox News or if they're on the list...
