Leicester? Leeds? General Chat? Or have you done the North East double and got kicked off the Mackem's board as well as the Geordies'?
No, Southampton. I genuinely did nothing wrong this time though. Fair enough that Leicester banned me, Newcastle less so, Southampton definitely not.
Just that their moderators were ****, which is funny as I said so on a thread about their moderators being ****.
Telling the moderators they're **** is probably a good way to get banned. Though I seriously doubt those moderators knew anything about any prior wrongdoings or any possible reputation, most moderators don't know that much about other clubs boards, unless there's been some long standing grief, or you've been such a naughty boy that you actually get a mention on the moderators board. For the record Erik, I've never seen you discussed on the moderator board, so I think it must just be down to you pissing someone off again. I haven't seen what you did to get banned on most of the boards, the Toons and Saints mods didn't ever contact me about you, but you did deserve the Leicester one.
I've been told that numerous mods have complained about me and that I risk a ban from the whole site (tell Chazz Rheinhold, he'll **** himself with the excitement). I've admitted that, fair enough, I can understand why the Leicester mods banned me. On the Newcastle board I made a joke about Demba Ba and cotton, nothing too OTT but in hindsight I maybe should have avoided offending the oversensitive Geordie teens. A permanent ban from their board? Not really necessary IMO, but I would say that wouldn't I. The Southampton mods are mental, even a thread about Claus Lundekvam raising money for charity has been deleted. Their fans are all moaning now about how they're ruining the board for them.
I've always found the Saints mod Beddytare to be a decent bloke, but I've never really had anything to do with their other two, do you know which of them banned you?
He's not too bad, and one of them I'm not sure I've encountered. The biggest numpty is channonfodder and I'm 101% sure it was him.
Brilliant !!! There's now a ' Justice for Erik' campaign on the Southampton board . They're saying it's a disgrace that you were booted off their board and are kicking off , well moaning a bit anyway . I've told them it's probably for the best as you can be ever so rude.
Can you still view their board then ? I'd have thought you have been barred from even viewing it , not just posting .
Nah, unlike me he's actually likeable. Well it was a race-related play on the term 'cotton wool'. It was something about Baa, Baa, Black Sheep, have you any wool? And then something along the lines of yes, of course, I'm black so I have access to as much cotton as I can steal.
The only way to PROTEST would be to boycott the game. Looks like many have as if the ticket prices were say £24 then over 3000 Tigers fans may have gone. With Champions League Footie on the box and West Ham in town satdee the floaters look as though they are buying OUR tickets for that game. Must admit than City fans should have stood firm on this one and stayed away. The club and players would have understood. ** the question i would like AP to answer is why did the club not send the entire allocation back to Barnsley with a strongly worded letter ? ** RIP OFF DOES NOT COME CLOSE. and yes i am as quilty as anyone for paying the price on this one
After the game i'd take a **** in my seat and stick a fake £30 in it, the robbing c u next tuesdays!
