I don't need that because it's actually happened so my logic was right. Logic was the means to make a prediction that was clear, specific and correct If I was guessing? I'd have done what you did and just make an I'll throughout punt in which no other club was interested which lead you to being wrong. You're seriously beyond dumb at times.
When I said what I did weeks ago. You guessed that another club must be interested. Admit that and I accept your point:
Still no evidence. No actual credible reasoning to suggest PSG where interested the best part of 4 weeks ago. For all you know the agent went around all the top clubs in Europe after we offered when we did. You have no actual facts. Just screenshots. That’s just poor form man. If your going to claim facts and glory you need to substantiate actual proof. You guessed, got lucky and well they ain’t actually bought him yet so let’s see if you are lucky.
You said that. But what proof do you have. You didn’t know **** all. You just said they where. I.E you covered your own back. That’s a simple game.
Tried telling you before that because is read it and that the new manager was keen There is no escape mate You Roland and GG were all wrong.
It becomes credible when logical reasoning is proved correct I was correct and I used logical reasoning.
I can’t be wrong. Because I wasn’t. You can’t prove otherwise. Please show me the evidence. I will yield if you can show me any evidence of a team being interested before we where.
That’s not evidence. That’s mental gymnastics. In a court of law. I want to see evidence. Not bullshit.
I don't need a court of law he's got interest from psg.. I said he had interest from bigger clubs and he has. Was I right? Yes or no