Treble is a brain dead loser who made up his example as I have never posted 0.16 to 0.2 was a 25 per cent rise (overall or otherwise). As I stated, 0.16 to 0.2 is an increase of 25 per cent. If you want to be a pedant (which you clearly do) then the overall increase is 20 per cent since (100 – (0.16/0.2 x 100)) = 20. Go and sit in the corner in your dunce’s hat.
No mate the clue is in the % sign after the numbers 0.2% and 0.16% which that illiterate docile **** has just omitted in his post above and which is exactly what he did the last time An increase of 0.16 to 0.2 is indeed a 25% increase, but an increase from 0.16% to 0.2% is just 0.04% increase. This was the point missed on the town hall pen pushing nigel last time and he's still not grasped it His selective twisting of EU %'s is equally bizarre.
Why would I be in possession of “your dunce’s hat”? Either learn to read or get yourself down to Le Specsavers...
You really are a total multi-account cretin. I am not and never have been a town hall pen pusher. I was a straight A math student when they did not just give everyone an A like the Lefties do now. It is probably too late for you to learn but there is no apostrophe required in a plural even when you use a symbol rather than the word: “%'s” should be “%s” or “percentages”. Selective twisting of the EU percentages equals stating the actual facts that were relevant to the point being made. Cretins like you hate facts. Can we officially call you a nonce if you lose your trial, Keyser Söze?
