She was riddled with dementia too. Used to cry out for her Dennis. Her carer used to delight in reminding her every day that he was dead.
Which they ironically got in safe space using the self and same whiny tactics, only to then follow us over here. A mass meltdown for best part of a decade, that's one hell of an achievement.
If we have to have a cranky old cow with dramatic mood swings in charge then Tina should be moderator. She's been here since the start and at least we know she's an actual woman as Barry doxxed her twitter pics.
At least she had Dennis. You are destined to die alone, Dennisless. Tbf Thatcher lasted far too long the evil bitch. Much the same as you tbph.
I don’t have Twitter and no thanks mind mick let me do it for one day on my birthday years ago and about 5 folk threatened to leave coz I doctored their posts
Just visible through the pub window if you know where to look by all accounts. please log in to view this image
So on a scale of 1 to 10 how would you describe your looks. 1 being ugly enough to give kids nightmares and 10 being...well...Bo Derek back when Bo was a 10. For purely scientific purposes btw.
This is true, despite his denials, he raised four reports yesterday for me to come to GC over a 3 hour period. The ONLY reason it stopped at 4 reports is because I took the function away from him. DMD Yesterday at 8:09 PM This is one of many sock accounts by a banned user. DMD Yesterday at 5:56 PM You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is defamatory, abusive, hateful, threatening, spam or spam-like, likely to offend, contains adult or objectionable content, contains personal information of others, risks copyright infringement, encourages unlawful activity, or otherwise violates any laws. DMD Yesterday at 5:53 PM You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is defamatory, abusive, hateful, threatening, spam or spam-like, likely to offend, contains adult or objectionable content, contains personal information of others, risks copyright infringement, encourages unlawful activity, or otherwise violates any laws.https://www.not606.com/help/terms DMD Yesterday at 5:23 PM A reasonable request was made of this mod, who misunderstood a post by another poster, and then deleted their explanation, and I suspect are using that to inaccurately justify a ban. As a mod, he should fully explain his actions so that others know where the lines are. If you guys don't want me here, stop calling me!
Someone posted Saxton's address in the tags. Which most people would agree is not acceptable. Tags were disabled. If that person posts people's personal information now they are held accountable. You could install 10 moderators and it wouldn't change anything . Brb disabled the tags preventing the snide stalker person from posting people's information anonymously. You are either too stupid to fathom that out or refuse to understand
Firstly, as you and I both well know, the reports are dealt with by the board mods, not supermods. I've even had reminders from supermods about some on ours that were missed, so nobody called you at all. Secondly, You've got a ****ed up version of 'constant'. "Thread closed, due to constant reporting of content by DMD, sorry guys." Thirdly, that is not the ONLY reason they stopped, that's just you trying to bull up your odd non-action. Also, those reports showed one of the regular ****wits from safespace was guilty of breaking the rules, unlike Pete, yet nothing happens beyond closing the whole thread, and exaggerating claims. Now that's cleared up, you can leave.
