British Politics

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
A.L.D.O 4.1 said:
Quarterwit is some kid. He is always on the side of the companies. He did the same with Wetherspoons when they said they would lay off all their staff because they couldn't afford to furlough them. Jumped right in with a bunch of figures to prove it was impossible for Wetherspoons to furlough their staff. Unfortunately he didn't know that Wetherspoons had indeed furloughed all their staff. What a tit he looked there.

Here he is, at it again. Poor P&O, quite right to illegally sack all their British workforce and replace them with £1.80ph slave labour! Next he'll be extolling the virtues of bringing back the press gangs so P&O can make even more profit.

Nowt to do with Brexit though. Irish and French workers not sacked though. Quarterwit says it's virtually impossible for companies to fùck over workers in France, like that is a bad thing!

No wonder this country is fùcked. The sooner Scotland get out of this floundering union the better. It's just about to roll over and sink without trace.
Click to expand...

<doh> No wonder Jockshire is fùcked with brain dead Nationalists like you. If you want to see a tit, then try looking in the mirror. Having already lost the argument, you have now reverted to digging up old discussions and adding in some new factual inaccuracies.

P&O Ferries did not “illegally sack all their British workforce” but why let the facts get in the way of a good rant? Where they did break the law is in their failure to consult with the 800 workers before getting rid of them. Telling the union 45 days in advance that they were going to sack them would have just had them all out on strike. As their employment contracts were drawn up under Jersey law they did not break British law when they tore them up. If they pay the redundancy monies due they will face no tribunals.

Why does the State employ so many people in France? Private sector companies are very reluctant to take people on because if they suffer a downturn in economic fortunes it is difficult to lay people off. Lack of flexibility in the jobs market makes France a bad place to set up a business and Socialism has resulted in economic stagnation. The French government owns a sixth of Renault and bails it out with loans. France is sinking without trace.

Brain dead Grant Shapps wrote to P&O and told them to reinstate the 800 workers. P&O wrote back and told the idiot that if they did that the company would go bust and then the other 2,200 workers would have no jobs either. Their £100m losses do not give any indication of sacking people to make more profit. Of course in brain dead Jockshire, Wee Jimmy McKrankie would simply have nationalised P&O.

In 2020, when P&O Ferries warned that 1,100 jobs could go because of losses, where were the howls of indignation? The company only lost £85m in 2020 and lost £38m in 2019. All the crazed Lefties have no understanding of how to run a business – if you lose money, you cease to exist. That is why they always want to nationalise everything so that everyone can share in the losses: the fast track to poverty.

In Scotland an incompetent SNP governs because there are enough deluded Nationalists voting for the one thing that they promise but they do not seem to be able to deliver: an Independent high tax nanny state.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
P&O Ferries did not “illegally sack all their British workforce” but why let the facts get in the way of a good rant? Where they did break the law is in their failure to consult

Is Quarterwit the stupidest cùnt in Christiandom?

Yes ladies and gentlemen he certainly is!

<laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: pompeymeowth and Gambol
Pete_ said:
Statue of explorer David Livingstone may be removed because he worked from age 10 in a mill that ‘likely’ used West Indian cotton – despite him being an abolitionist credited with helping end the slave trade
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...moved-slavery-links-despite-abolitionist.html
Click to expand...

Rome, Egypt, Bath and various other places should be concerned that they may be forced to lose so many of their tourist attractions.

A lot of religious books should be taken off the shelves too, by the same standards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego and petersaxton
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back