bit sad this. Couple of posters following you around for kicks while you are watching 30 men roll round in the mud.
Ponky, please try and take this in - my decision to withdraw fron the wager had nothing to do with Pieguts post, but everything to do with yours... and your seeming inability to understand simple concepts. Pieguts is not a poster I choose to engage with, partly because I find his posts don't really say much of interest, but mainly because him once putting B'Wood on ignore, not out of any personal beef, but simply because he found him irritating, marked him as 'not my kind of guy.' B'Wood may be a tediously boring **** and particularly poor poet, but did not warrant putting on ignore - in my view. That Pieguts has targeted me for holding that view is fine - but doesn't alter me finding him somewhat irrelevant as a poster - if he stopped posting on the site I'm not sure I'd notice - not sure anyone would, for that matter. Now on to your post. You thought you'd be clever by inferring, whether in jest or seriously, that you would seek suggestions from other posters as to the avatar that would be given to me if you won the wager we had made. As I mentioned, I am not particulary fussed with avatar bets but some posters seem to love them, so I'll generally play along. But if the protagonist poster lacks the wit, intelligence, imagination or simple inclination, to come up with the forfeit themselves then, for me, there really is no point to having the wager - your post yesterday put you in one of those categories - others can decide which ... but it means that you now join Munse in being a poster that I wouldn't take an avatar bet with, for those reasons. For the avoidance of doubt, there is no bet welching - the game does not take place until tomorrow... so any claim of welching puts the claimant in the lack of intelligence category mentioned above. There is no flounce - I'm here and happily doing what I always do - on my terms - as is my right. Now I realise that this is quite a long post, so a shortened version will follow for those readers who prefer the shortened form.
I don’t know what’s happened here but if you’re writing essays to justify it then you’ve definitely made a **** of yourself.
Was a really good match ... popping on here in the breaks to see the ongoing fizz was also entertaining, but nowhere close to as exciting ...
... on this forum that would mean I'd made it! PS there is a shortened version for that very reason - the essay was to aid Ponky's understanding of the decision, as he was having some challenges ... there was a clue ... it commences with "Ponky"
Liverpool forward Mohamed Salah, 29, has no intention of signing the contract extension offered to him by the club in December. The Egypt international is out of contract in 2023 but talks are currently at a standstill. (Fabrizio Romano - via Star) Salah's agent has appeared to mock claims by club manager Jurgen Klopp that Liverpool "cannot do much more" in the negotiations. If it’s good enough for you it’s good enough for me…
So Fosse welched my bet because Pieguts gave him a bit of light bantz, and Fosse hates pie coz he once put Windy on ignore. somebody call the old bill 10/10 Karen
https://bettinggods.com/faqs/can-you-cancel-a-bet-before-a-game-starts/ Not read it all, but I’d say the decision wether to cancel is down to the bookie. @Spurlock Earn your money bro.
He’s made a bigger tit of himself by flapping about this bet than he would if he’d lost it anyway lol. And it didn’t even need a ball to be kicked
Can someone post up the ‘stamp of approval?’ Before we go any further, we might as well check that the bet was actually approved and verified. Sure it’s somewhere…
