Just think if they hadn't cut all their lucrative sponsorship they could have afforded Fat Franks severance pay
Canny pleased we ended up with Eddie and not frank. Easy to say of course with how things have panned up. It’s ****ing karma for me like for him ditching Derby for Chelsea !
Seems a **** managerial move to bring a January signing on at his old ground when 5-0 down…. I’d feel mortified as a player. You’re hardly coming on thinking “now I’ll show them what they’re missing” - it’d make me feel angry at my manager for embarrassing me
Thought pl rules stated that players on loan weren’t allowed to play against their parent clubs or is it at the clubs discretion? Either way, it’s ****ing ****housery of the finest order bringing him on when they’re 5-0 down like!
They bought him! Actually parted money. Deal could cost up to £40m That said, £40m would be based on performances, so unlikely.