Pay their way and they can have as much peace love and harmony as they want. If they can't don't or won't then get to ****
Who moi? I don't care about rugby. When FC play I hope they win, when Rovers play, I hope they win. When they they play each other, I don't care who wins. When City play and win I'm buzzing and when they lose I'm gutted. That's my position and it always has been. Just to make myself clear.
I'm just a City fan rt. I live on the West Side, but as I understand it, the East Side are Hull too. Its all Hull and I love the place dearly. I have great friends in East Hull (I also have a couple in Leeds, but I do feel very uncomfortable admitting that, the white **** ****s). Like I said, it's a time for love peace and harmony.
Oh I know rt, I just thought It'd be a good idea to explain to the window lickers of East Hull Another joke
According to Adam Pearson, FC could hypothetically find the funds to build their own stadium, but cringes at the thought of a 50/50 split. Like the bloke in the pub who claims he makes a lot of money but disappears when it’s his turn to get a round in.
Kalman I like you as a poster but why would Hull pay the same as City when they don’t use the stadium as much? Though saying that maybe after what Lambretta said maybe City need to be paying more. I love both clubs by the way but it’s getting petty now.
It's been pretty since the day the stadium opened . Maybe it would have been better if Adam Pearson had never bought City in the first place then these arguments would never be here.
As far as new owners are concerned, let's just be grateful we weren't bought by Inoff the Red, the Russian snooker player otherwise we'd be in a right mess now
In all seriousness, I think the fairest deal for both clubs and fans would be for both clubs to front the full costs for their respective match days. Like you said, FC play 13 games or something? They should pay all expenses for those 13 games and City does the same for our 23 games.
