I am not sure that is right. The loan is actually from a BVI company owned by Abramovich. If that company was confiscated from him through sanctions then Chelsea would owe the debt to whoever controlled the company post confiscation, presumably a national government. The loan presumably has some terms and conditions on repayment which could be enforced against Chelsea.
What about Marco Materazzi in the 2006 WC final? Conceded a soft penalty, scored the equaliser, got headbutted in the chest, then scored in the shootout All that was missing was full-frontal nudity
How did the officials do on the weekend? Let's ask a ref and a Scouser! https://www.skysports.com/football/...nalty-appeal-for-handball-by-rodri-vs-everton Kick in the balls? That's fine.
I believe Putin wants a return to the Soviet style with him as a miniature Stalin.This is a start. Abrimovich as a No.1 Commisar in charch of more oil wells?
Both players went as high as each other and both missed the ball, complete accident and dealt with appropriately by the ref. Really don't know why peeps are crying over this tbh. Even chaloba is crying he had stitches from itl Could easily have been the other way round
It's just an obvious red card. Chalobah's foot is well wide of Keita. He never endangers his opponent. One player goes for the ball, while the other goes for two.
Yeh i saw it mate, its a 50/50 ball and they both go high and miss, one gets caught & **** happens. If you send off naby you have to send off chaloba too no? Or you saying the contact and not the intent is what he should be punishing? Either way you're wrong And chalobah's salty tears are just icing in the cake for me anyway
Chalobah goes for the ball and gets the ball. Makes no contact with Keita, at all. Keita misses the ball completely and kicks Chalobah full force in the nads. These are not the same thing. They're not even close.
Are you either blind or lying about having seen it? Watch the first angle on the Sky tweet. The ball's going left, then it goes right. How did that happen?
