Not sure how this makes any difference as he retains ownership. If the oligarchs could save their assets from sanctions by simply transferring "stewardship" I'm sure they'd all be at it.
I did want to ask the opinion of some of you who I'm sure know more about finance than I do. Regarding this 1.5 billion "loan" that Chelski have, presumably this counts as an "asset" of Abramovich so presumably if action is taken against him then this could be part of that action. But how would it affect the loan?
The loan means he is on the company "creditors payable within N years" list.
The fact that a creditor is also the owner, is moot in the letter of the law.
Similarly if someone wants to be stupid on this front, he could simply
sell the debt to someone (another shareholder etc) for a nominal sum,
and do the converse once things have quietened down.
Chelsky is a Sugga Daddy plaything, not a business whose operation
is key to the size of Romans' final pension pot.