City will not be affected by the FFP rules as moves such as their mega stadium naming rights deal allow them to remove the debt from their balance sheets.
Oh jolly good, spiffing infact. Seriously though, who the **** is he? Why has he only started to talk bullshit now city have got some spending money? Where was this **** when you were the usually ****, small time minnows that you always will be deep down?
He has always been around City, but you have been walking round with your head up your arse. Now you've taken a right good thrashing in your own back garden you want someone connected with City to have a go at. Bitter?
Probably why no one had heard of him until about a year ago. Seriously, the only reason anyone's heard of him now is that Sky feel the need to have someone connected to City when they show your games live. Unfortunately he seems to be the best City have to offer. You'd think Sky would at least be able to stretch to Peter Reid now he's got the boot from Plymouth...or maybe a Franny Lee / Alan Ball combo
In the past, yes. But now, with the best squad in the prem, and having smashed Uniteds back doors in, I think City are the ones now taking the piss out of you.
With the cringeworthy biased comments whenever the likes of Crerrand,disgraced club ambassador Robson or the bald ******ed forger micky Thomas are wheeled out for comments,it's a bit hypocritical isn't it? How ironic that you like to label city fans as bitter. Face facts chaps,you're **** and the tide has turned Get used to it,hope the bitterness doesn't eat away at you too much
At least Sky have ditched Crerand - he only really gets to air his BS on MUTV, and if you're watching MUTV you probably aren't interested in a fair and unbiased view... Most Utd fans I know readily admitted that Crerand was so biased it was embarrassing. I thought that was why Sky dropped him five or six years ago. And Mickey Thomas gets five minutes a week on Key 103 if he's lucky, hardly the same platform as Sky Sports at lunchtime! But your point is fair - all clubs do seem to have their own mad biased old players hidden away in the broom closet only to emerge when the media people want to stir the pot. I wonder if punditry naturally attracts the most biased players - Red Nev's new Sky post implies it probably does
