Science - It's life Jim but not as we know it...

Based on what ?

 

That is true but we will run out of natural resources in the long term, when we have destroyed all the forests and emptied the oceans we will be left with a wasteland that nothing can grow in

 

That's what I mean about using our resources properly

That comes down to will ultimately

But yeah, we're on that path currently

 

I think Attenborough was right when he said the biggest threat to the planet was overpopulation

 

Why do I have to base it on anything, it's just a theory

 

Pretty sure when Gates said the same thing all the vaccine conspiracy nutters decided he was trying to kill us all

 

Closely followed by a throwaway culture where domestic appliances etc are designed and built to last 5 years and then be scrapped as well as the crazy fashion industry where clothes you buy today and out of date by tomorrow so you replace your clothes at a faster and faster rate. well the female half of the population

 

Yep, ultimately the planet only has finite resources to sustain a certain number of people

The point I make about resources, is for our current population, there's enough to go around

We probably won't reach a point of actual overpopulation in terms of pure numbers on the planet needed to sustain everybody though on the path we're heading environmentally at the moment though

If we did, we would probably start colonising other planets once we'd run out of space and resources on Earth.

 

This reminds me

one day I’ll put the Ayuhesca thread up

 

Because most theories are based on an argument innit.

Just wondering why you think no meat would make waify ****s ?

 

That thread defo needs doing one day.

 

I think eating meat for protein is different to eating pulses for protein.

I think the meat has other affects on our body…affects the physiology of some parts of the body

 

How many Vegan Olympic medal winners can you name

 

Yeah it's different protein for sure

I'm not arguing for plant diet over a meat diet or the other way round

I think people can either eat healthy or eat ****, which is ultimately more important individual health

As for the planet's health, that might be a different argument ?

 

Planet needs to take more vitamins? Maybe exercise more?

I dunno

 

Anyway, we all worry and moan about resources and the way we deplete them yet forget, Gaia will look after herself and the rest of nature, if we push too far she will wipe us out with climate change regardless of what we do with carbon.

 

Yeah maybe

No though

In terms of rearing millions of animals, clearing forest and turning over food that we could grow for humans to feed to animals to eat them

Or growing food just for humans

I dunno which is better either ?

Needs a poll

 

Mother Earth is raring to destroy us

when lockdown happened, nature and wildlife changed

we all saw it, it was well documented

less air pollution, wildlife roaming much more free etc etc

 

Meat ain't just for humans mate, my dog wouldn't live without it.