Sargent an illness doubt again, Kabak definitely out ill for a second game. Rupp back available, Omobamidele back in training. Sorensen won't be rushed but has come back sooner than expected. Same timeline as Krul (end of the month). Smith mentioned the extra control he felt they had with a 4-3-3 Vs Wolves
I'd guess it'll be a 4-3-3 again as that's what Palace uses: Aarons Hanley Gibson Williams Lees-Melou Normann/Gilmour McLean Sargent/Idah Pukki Rashica Here's WhoScored's prediction:
That's excellent mate. The invoice for my I.T consultancy is in the post. If you get another win I'll waive the fee.
There was nothing wrong with my choice of words. My mistake was to assume that Duncan's appreciation of logic was greater than it turned to to be. What really emerges from this is how quick people are to attach a negative interpretation to anything I post. Pathetic. Another example is Duncan complaining I haven't posted much on match day threads, and assuming that's because we've been winning etc. OK, from now on I'll make a point of posting "I told you DF was the problem" on every match day thread.
If we win "See told you DF was the problem " If we lose "See told you we are getting relegated " My cursed appreciation of logic or lack there of
Yup, looks likely come the end of the season I'll have been right on both counts. But like you, I'm not hugely bothered about relegation because, as I previously posted, I think S&S will get us back up within two seasons well able to survive. PS Your Ignore button not working?
Frankly rude and unnecessary post. The problem was entirely with your words (and is here, which are just objectionable), where yet again (and it’s been explained to you at length before) you keep stating opinion as fact and then only later state it is an opinion, even though you actually have no intention of addressing counterpoints to your opinion (because you don’t actually agree it is an opinion, you actually think your opinion is fact). You are now going on with our “interpretation” - how about for once you take some ownership and maybe add some nuance and respect to your posts, accept challenges to your opinions and update them with new evidence? Then you might find people’s “intepretation” of your posts are less frustrated and more accommodating. I’ve and I think everyone else on here have got plenty of time for interesting differing opinions and debates. Your problem is you don’t debate and have no interest in other’s differing views. It’s just plain ridiculous.
Robbie I think you are the one who struggles with logic and interpretation, if you don’t realise that Dunc is making the very valid point that you are going through mental gymnastics of pretending you can have your cake and eat it, so you never have to admit being wrong. It’s utterly transparent.
