Firstly if you are the DPP the head honcho, the big cheese, the boss, the chief and your department signs off something as sensitive as the Saville investigation and you claim you know nothing about it that can only be utter bullshit or at best total and utter incompetence the buck stops with the chief. That’s why he was paid the big bucks, with this not the first time Saville abuse allegations aided by eye witness accounts had crossed the offices of the DPP and this time we are talking about 4 people who were raped as children two of them 14 years of age. And as for his Rochdale grooming gang advice to police and CPS it was outrageous and condemned many young girls to vile and unnecessary abuse over quite a few more years, if you think that is the actions of a worthy future prime minister then god help us, it is all very well to hide behind ‘I don’t know enough about it’, we’ll some of us do. You and Starmer cannot have it both ways, if the buck stops with the chief then they are both guilty one of lying and one of lying/incompetence of the highest order, the electorate deserve to know the truth about both.
I thought all that was needed to trigger a leadership challenge was a vote of no confidence - and to trigger that you need 50 MPs to sign a request for it? I might be wrong but I think it’s something similar, so it would be quite simple.
YOU ARE RIGHT NOT THAT SIMPLE... missed PMQ's unless it recorded .. to be honest the opposition and the media have no concern or respect for the people, the economy, the government and most of all the IMPORTANT things that need addressing. The economy the progression of getting on with addressing the needs of the poorer areas, the problem of UKRAINE, mopping up the epidemic of Covid, and looking to OUR future prosperity as a leading nation recovering as one of the best from the dark age of the past 2 years .... thats WHAT THEY should be doing, NOT using repetitive attempts at the same old things trying to political points scoring / or outselling other papers / or as far as BBC /ITV go trying out out word and drag up as many issues repetitive issues using interviews etc. FUNNY WE CAN NEVER CHANGE THE PAST, what is done is done .... we need to work for the future not dwell on the past .. check out Country file.. some good clues there about peeps getting on with the future and their lives
That would require 50 Tory MP’s to vote against their own leader, then a majority of MP’s to vote him down, that’s a difficult thing to achieve, to many of them are frightened how they will be dealt with if it fails, that’s not a party political point, it would be equally difficult to get rid of a Labour PM with a similar majority.
ITS NOT POLITICAL POINTS FFS, it’s about the integrity and honesty of our PM. All the things you complain aren’t being dealt with would be if he had the decency to resign, that’s why he needs to go. We can’t just ignore he’s lied to us all and just carry on as normal. The government rules by consent once that has gone it’s authority to rule has gone too
I’d be saying exactly the same if it was a Labour PM, it’s not party politics, it’s way beyond that it about the integrity and honesty of OUR PM regardless of his party.
These are issues since he’s been PM, he lied before that didn’t stop him becoming PM, as I said no one’s perfect, but once you are PM you are judged by your conduct whilst fulfilling the role.
I HAVE, TM's comments in line with her line on things .. and WOMBLE's melt down had me in stitch's ...should stick to his pre written scripts ...
If by WOMBLE you mean Ian Blackford he was making a very serious point, whilst actually pointing out FACTS about Boris, if you find that funny that explains a lot.
Read Simple Politics, they say about Blackfords comments that you can be ordered out of the commons for telling the truth , whereas Boris can repeatedly lie to the commons and that’s fine. Says it all doesn’t it?
Nonsense you are also judged by the skeletons in your cupboard, in fact that should be far more important to voters, then perhaps we wouldn’t get lumbered with the likes of Johnson, May, Cameron, Brown, Blair and the prospect of Starmer or Corbyn.
Which would be interesting, 3 Countries you've named that are open in having complete control of their people!!
It's been a while... Just thought I'd drop in on this one as I don't believe it's particularly correct. Firstly, there are a list of things you could criticise Starmer for as DPP, this is not one of them. Starmer was not part of the investigation, there is no mention of him in any relevant report, and there is a chance he knew little about it, as they were unable to proceed as none of the complainants were prepared to support the police. It was no more than had been presented over the previous 3 decades. With no evidence you cannot convict, particularly if you're not a part of the investigation. Even Tory MP's are publicly disgusted at Boris's insinuation here, which tells you all you need to know. If Starmer had been at fault, they'd be all over it, but they're not. Johnson is also refusing to reiterate his remarks outside of Parliament (where he could be prosecuted for libel). If it was true, there would be nothing for him to worry about. It's bollocks. If you'd like to see any facts about senior politicians' attitude towards child sex abuse, Boris Johnson once said on radio that investigating child sexual abuse is “spaffing money up the wall”. Surely none of us in here think that is a waste of money? The same Johnson who is currently defunding pretty much every part of the legal system. You mention skeletons in your cupboard... well there's a blatant and factual one. It's a silly argument anyway, but if you're debating who has had the worst impact on investigating child sexual abuse, you might want to look at the party that has been in power for 12 years, constantly defunding and making things far more difficult for the police in that time.
I’m hearing Boris put off a call with Putin to talk to his own MP ‘s in an attempt to save his own skin. Doesn’t that show his priorities?
Spot on .. When you go to Scotland, and for years likely at least the 6 or whenever YES OR NO NO VOTE was over, they the Scots had a names for Nicola, and a name for Blackford to complicated to explain the reasoning. I thought he was going to explode, or least start bleeding from ears nose and eyes ... almost every PMQ's his Q's are the same [ mind you so are KS's of late ] ... Someone on here dreamed up nickerless ... didnt see you reply to that .. but a very good lighthearted faux pas
I notice you didn’t comment on my observation about his comments being accurate though in relation to Boris’s behaviour.
Boris’s accusation of Kier, as BCFCrob pointed out are not accurate, Boris wont repeat it outside of parliament and even Tory MP’s distance themselves from it. It’s another example of Boris making things up, or in other words not being honest or accurate. edit That even includes Dominic Raab on Radio 4’s Today programme
your interpretation not mine! ... " leave the house immediately " .... and take your scripts with you
