Cantwell

Which, unless English isn’t your first language, means I did answer your question. Or unless you’re wumming again or deliberately being thick. Take your pick.

 

No what you've done is found an excuse to validate being wrong when you claimed Bruce wasn't doing aswel as he should with this group of players.

Now you're insulting the guy that was being fair

 

@Andra Tutto Bene

Here's a follow up question.

If all requires is more time to me judged then why are the fans saying the current players aren't good enough to get better results ?

 

Because he has time to add some of his own players

 

No. You’re trying and failing to engineer an answer that you want.

You have asked a question and I have answered it. It’s a valid answer and a rational answer. And it’s my honest answer. But not the one that you wanted. Therefore, you say it’s not answering your question which it actually did.

You weren’t being fair as you weren’t prepared to accept my answer was genuine and, therefore, opened yourself up to sarcasm and/or insult.

Tap dance as much as you want it’s all summed up in that one post.

 

So again.

Why isn't he capable of getting the results from the side he's got and btw he's had 37ms already and he's picking different players from the 25

 

Becuase the current side includes Lascelles and Shelvey

 

Again you fail to understand.

I'll try a different avenue

Was I fair wheh I spent 2 years arguing that Bruce deserved credit without the buts when results were good and criticise when they were not?

Is it then fair of me to treat Howe the same way?

That's the element of fair I was referring to.

 

Bruce didn't sign them Howe's picking them both too

 

Pointless me answering as you aren’t prepared to accept any answer other than the one you want. And I have better ways to waste my time than having a discussion with someone who isn’t prepared to listen.

 

Aye it's worrying he can't see that they're costing us

 

You're getting ancy again because you don't like the fact I've been fair and consistent.

After two years of you trying desperately to argue that Bruce wasn't doing aswel as he should with these players! Whether he finished 12t 13th or faced with stats to match your beloved rafa Benitez you refused to credit him without the ifs and buts.

Today you're giving Howe all the ifs and buts to the contrary.

I'll stick with criticism and credit based on results not my agenda thanks

 

Then you've lost because you don't acknowledge the areas of debate you don't want to.

You should run for local parliament.

You get a bit personal though when confronted with those areas so perhaps not.

 

This was you avoiding giving Bruce credit for the second half of last season. You wanted to credit Jones.

Jones is of course still here

 

Lost. I thought you were above school leaving age.



You don’t like an answer and refuse to accept it. See my post above, And then you expect a person to answer other questions. There’s no point as you still won’t listen.

I call it refusing to continue banging my head against a brick wall. You can call it whatever you like because I simply don’t care. You’re wumming and you can now do it without me. I’m happy to debate anything but not with a person who won’t listen. I can waste my time in more interesting ways.

Ciao.

 

That’s the only big problem to be fixed mate.

If Howe sorts that he’s on to a winner.

 

He hasn't though and he's not going to...

 

I’m giving him to the end of this window to fix that problem.

And if he does that. Then I’m giving him to the end of the season to improve performances and results.