I assume this is more - concern and disagreement about upcoming stricter covid measures ? Edit: it is. So his concern is that the government is not being Tory enough it seems ?
Wow this is hot news! A serious blow to Bonko who will whitewash it as much as possible....But I still think it will be NI which finally scuppers him.
How so? What is actually going on with that at the moment? And how might it be enough to scupper him? Asking because I find that situation confusing and have kind of lost track
Good riddance to another total grifting waster. The irony of an ‘unelected bureaucrat’ holding that exact position wasn’t lost on me either. I suppose he did ONE useful thing for the country at the end at least. Now piss off.
Do you not think that even if the Conservative party ceased to exist, they would just rebrand and rebuild with the usual donors and media support pushing them straight into the void? For me the only way to loosen the stranglehold of the Tories is by neutering the written media. As you said in another post, McDonnell and Corbyn were preparing to tackle that problem. Even now Murdoch (king maker) is a regular visitor to number 10 and I saw something recently that said, iirc, that of news briefings given behind the doors at number 10, 86% of those meetings only included journalists from right wing newspapers.
I have been thinking over the past few days as to who Johnson is comparable with in terms of character and ability. And it is Berlusconi, another world class charlatán, who, like Johnson does now, appointed ministers (bimbos in his case) with absolutely no aptitude for.the task.
Blimey I think I would prefer bimbos to the malicious and corrupt lot we have now Things like the corrupt handing out of covid contracts is worse than the incompetent bungling of it. Because not only does it not get properly sorted but loads of money gets flushed away at the same time - both from the country and to people who don’t deserve it
Politics is going to change and I think that as capitalism is discredited, the dividing line will be on progressive matters perhaps centred around identity issues and the environment . The issue of the "economy" will seem less relevant when there is no planet to support ecocomies. I do not see the issues that appeal to traditional Tory voters having a similar appeal to a younger generation. In fact, I just feel that they will be totally disinterested in what the Conservatives represent. This is why, coupled with the large degree of disatisfaction with Boris, that I do not see an attempt to break up the Conservative party as being problematic or undemocratic. In fact, the behaviour of the Conservatives under Boris could easily be argued as a threat to democracy. I also think that we are going to start seeing different kinds of politicians and especially women like Ahern in NZ and Sturgeon in Scotland being more of the norm. Many ofthe Westminster politicians look hopelessly out of date across all the spectrums at the moment. At some point the establishment is going to have to recognise that the old models of MPs have past the sale by date.
I’m not certain identity issues is something that enough people care about outside of Twitter. I wouldn’t be surprised if in the country as a whole more people that you think don’t want to go along with it People hate being lectured to. And that is what a lot of the progressive and identity movements are doing. And example is the attempt to exactly transport the US style BLM over to the U.K. with no tailoring for our country’s very different demographics and relationship with race to the US You come intriguingly close to imply that politicians will be better simply because they are women. You pick out some examples of effective actors. But for every Ardern and Sturgeon there is a May, Patel, Dorries, Truss etc Or even the Finnish PM who went out clubbing during a covid scare There are effective and ineffective politicians of all identities Again we could applaud the increase in minority politicians. But then look at basically any of the minorities in the current cabinet and see that this doesn’t stop them being just as venal and corrupt as those who are “out of date” (I assume a euphemism for middle-aged/old white male) So I’d just be cautious on the identity stuff And the environment stuff is great but kind of requires the money to stop being sucked upwards. Because right now it is SEEN by many as a further tax on people who can’t afford it and not being paid by many who can
Labour were going to implement the Leveson report, part 2, that the Tories kicked into the long grass, part of which would be an investigation into the relationship between the media and various bodies, such as the police and, iirc, political parties. My version of “neutering” the media, is something I have put on here before. In a nutshell, when, for example, the Mail prints something that is untrue, (which is probably everyday in all honesty), if a complaint is upheld the written apology should match the original lie in size of print, column inches and duration. So a front page lie, with follow up falsehoods covering pages 3, 4 & 5, with further columns over the next 3 days embellishing the original lie, would require an apology in the same format covering the front page and pages 3, 4 & 5, instead of the apology being a 2 inch column buried in the arse end of the paper, amongst advertising or trivia. The full apology should run for the same number of days as the lie was mentioned or referred to, to ensure the maximum number of their readers saw it and understood that they were being lied to.
No they won’t. Otherwise they would have done by now. Since as you say - they are historical. If there was sufficient dirt to warrant and arrest it would have been dragged out during the elections there isn’t and there wasn’t the police don’t arrest people because The Sun and The Daily Mail would really like them to
Most media including the Mail report incitement to burn MP's offices, the Telegraph states MP's homes as the target.
Greg, the first post was tongue in cheek because people on here know I don't like Corbyn, it's my duty to say something. I know he's not going to be arrested more's the pity. I used "historical" because there is plenty of stuff to research on the net already. God knows what he's been up to recently though. I've posted many examples in the past so please don't ask for a source or proof, I already have. People like to turn a blind eye when it comes to Corbyn because backing a terrorist sympathiser can be a bit awkward so best to deny he ever was. And the excuse that he was paving the way to the peace process is complete BS. Also the reference to The Sun and The Daily Mail has been used on here before to undermine or end a discussion when they are struggling with a credible argument. From what I've seen of your previous posts you are more than capable than to resort to the old "Daily Mail" tactic.
Oh the irony. If something not "done to death" was a pre requisite for posting on here, this board would be empty. Same old stuff regurgitated daily, but that doesn't seem to bother you.
