ah the report button again No Faint Hearted or people that get upset when they cant win a point of difference and it doesn't go the way they planned
jammy said It seemed a healthy debate with both sides putting their respective views in a fair and reasonable manner until it didn't go my way
Yes well done, you win. Try not to ask ridiculous questions in future and I'll try not point out your inadequacies.
another nasty retort from you, but i wont insult you, could you please point out the ridiculous question you disagree with as im a loss to which comment inflamed you so
so don't want to answer, so that you dont have people seeing its a ruse and deflection policy by you, when being shown the error of your ways
You and me both, Ell, but did anyone care? No they f*cking didn't the bastards!! Mind you, I've had a lot more birthdays than you so I won't miss this one. But, in any case, HAPPY BIRTHDAY, ELLANDBACK (sorry, finger slipped)
I see the little girls have been wound up again. I'm going to tell teacher on you if you don't let me play.
Unfortunately not. Due to recent events I find myself compelled to make myself available on this thread on a permanent basis.
And many of them reported pre trial that he crossed state lines illegally, with an illegal weapon, was a white supremacist etc etc etc (including his own president) all of which were demonstrably false.
And IF he had been found guilty, well the obvious headline would have been...."white supremacist Kyle Rittenhouse guilty on all charges".........the media are the drivers
No news organisation was embedded into either of the teams. The one that crossed the line was MSNBC who tailed the jury bus. The narrative from especially MSNBC but also CNN was disgusting. Not only rushing to judgement but also, since the verdict, they have painted it as a miscarriage which is why those who only get their news from those sites have such a twisted view. The protests had a racial slant for some reason. This was a white kid who shot 3 white men during a protest. What the protest was about was irrelevant so why are BLM aggravated. I've heard the ridiculous argument that it's racial because a black man who did the same thing would have been convicted. That's nonsense.
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/11/09/us/kyle-rittenhouse-trial-tuesday/index.html Read this and tell me he's guilty and this is even before the defence case started. And it's CNN!
Bill Maher is a Democrat and here he sums up the problem with the Democratic Party. It's the same for Labour over here. They need to reconnect to working class Brits. The votes they get in the urban playground will never be larger than the votes they used to get in their heartland.
https://eu.tcpalm.com/story/news/cr...defense-raid-killed-alteria-woods/4645147001/ A J Coffee was found not guilty on the same day as Rittenhouse. He shot at Deputies raiding his father's house. His girlfriend was killed in the crossfire and a Deputy was injured. Upon searching the house they found drugs and he was a convicted felon who should not have had a gun. The State didn't prove that he was not defending himself under the State's Stand Your Ground law. You probably haven't heard about this as it doesn't fit the narrative. I'm going to imagine some people saying "Yes, but....."
