No? How come you're perfectly happy to live your life using products that rely on their oil for manufacture without batting a f@cking eyelid about human rights you congenital idiot.
You're a liar. You've never done anything about human rights until two weeks ago... You might have a little cry for the 1st time last summer and never between then and two weeks ago. You all went quiet on it the minute pif withdrew That's all the evidence required to know you're a dishonest and disgusting turd.
He's just a liar... Ultimately he knows aswel as we do that he doesn't care about human rights issues.
Ahaha hook it in to my veins - this see you next tuesday needs to get a life, lurking here waiting for his next attempt at faux moral outrage when in reality he's probably loving all their products irl and jerking off to the Disney channel like the nonce he is.
**** me, now you need a dead man to try and deflect from who your new owners are. Take a ****ing good hard look at yourself mate
At least he’s allowed to reply here. Go to the unwashed board and you’ll get blocked but they will still continue to throw abuse without allowing you to reply. Cowardly too.
Nope anyone does and the abuse without a chance of reply continues in a cowardly way. Even the ****ers are being left unblocked on here, as you can see.
Ooh, an attempt at wit, well done. There's quite a few of your lot who post over there who get left alone. As i said, only the ****ers get blocked. So a serious question for you,. Do you think that the appropriate thing to say about Walter Smith passing is that it should "take some of the heat off you this weekend"?
Not true actually. If you think the banter goes too far then someone should be banned for that day maybe as people calm down. We can all get carried away. That allows a chance to reply later when people have calmed down. Permanent bans should only come later. Those banned for going too far should also go both ways and maybe with a warning first allowing apologies if necessary. The two way banter is what makes some threads work. As for Walter Smith no in that instance I think that wasn’t appropriate to say.
Agree with the bolded part. As to the Walter Smith comment i'm surprised that none of you called munson up on it to be honest. He's clearly one that has been totally sportwashed
Probably should have been yes. The sports washing thing is selective. Not going to bother listing everything else linked to Saudi Arabia or others with similar records as we all know them. Roy is correct in saying there hasn’t been this kind of outcry about them before this takeover though and correct in pointing out how many hypocritical human rights warriors that have only now appeared out of the woodwork especially when so many would have welcomed that takeover at their own club.
Incorrect. I'm a ****er and haven't been blocked. Non ****ers who don't even post on your board yet get blocked in case they dare to wind up the sensitive souls on your board. Speak to Sid. He's on record as saying that approach is very wrong and he's an experienced man in the know.. I know from your response to Roy you don't support this type of ban happy behaviour. The SAFC board at one point accounted for 2/3 of all the ban requests site wide btw (over quite a number of months)..... So there is a monopoly on sensitivity over the fence one might presume....
Yeh they banned for asking how their takeover was going after the del thing fell apart. Yet here they all are acting like mother Theresa.
Don't forget if you don't get blocked... your posts will miraculously alter themselves.... ask @jimileysbaldhead
This is very true, when I kicked off about it Gordon Blue rinse banned me for speaking some home truths. Which, incidentally many of their lads agreed with ( not the banning ). I do believe the insipid tosser has since been relieved of his mod duties.
