No. The twitter thread. Do you think the % rate of vaccinated people is a % of the total vaccinated? As the number is higher, it will be a tiny fraction of them.
No, I didn't read the Twitter thread, I didn't even zoom into the table or was it a graph? I am busy watching the first episode of the new series of Have I Got News For You which I believe was aired last night.
After witnessing the 99% white Labour conference with mainly middle aged Red faced angry communists , we all know who the real gammons are
It was the epitome of a Whitey male gammonfest Non-inclusive. "Come on now, let's see some female and/or darkie hands raised comrades"
Actually, you were out 3.125 per cent with your maths, but numeracy is not really your thing. But you got a like from conspiracy theorist Lochers – he loves dodgy numbers.
This from February didn't age well COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca confirms 100% protection against severe disease, hospitalisation and death in the primary analysis of Phase III trials https://www.astrazeneca.com/media-c...the-primary-analysis-of-phase-iii-trials.html From that to , of course more fully vaccinated peeps are suffering from severe disease,hospitalisations and death than the unvaccinated. There's more jabbed than unjabbed. Derpy Derpy derp
I did. You said that the amount will be more because more people were vaccinated. I agreed and also pointed out that the rate is higher in vaccinated people(or so it says). Out of say 100 vaccinated people there will be more catching covid compared to the amount of people catching it out of 100 unvaccinated people.
Everyone buddy. They keep lying and folk forgot the lies as they’ve replaced the lie with another one and peeps like you just forget the original lie and argue for the new lie until it’s obvious that the new lie was a lie but by then they’ve replaced the new lie with a newer lie. Peeps are thick and gullible as ****.
I only read the text of the tweet and it mentioned the rate was higher for vaccinated, I was explaining the rate to you, as it looked like you were getting mixed up. I will look at it later, going to take my elder boy into town.
I don't remember anyone claiming the vaccine confered 100% immunity to the virus. When it comes to gullible, check out your sub-50 IQ sidekick's posts ffs
It's patently obvious that the "vaccines " aren't intended to offer any degree of "immunity " to It's trialists. Yet the unvaccinated control group are somehow a risk to the vaccinated. That's some next level behavioural psychologists handiwork.
