Takeover (Covid-19/20)

They are trying to use a technicality in which the CAT case is not needed as is already happening with the ARB and that NUFC and SJHL are one and the same in this context.

The fact that the case content is different in each case doesn't seem to have been brought up yet.

 

I think Michael Cutting is playing on his PS5 as he keeps jumping and moving and whincing!

 

He boring them to death, The case is going to get thrown out because they cant be arsed with him.

 

He looks like Lee Charnley

 

This ****er needs to be put on CBBC bed time story's - bet he's a blast at a party.

 

Anyone got a link? Cba to look back.

 

Gonna have half an hour away this guy is boring me to death!

 

It's his final bit.

 

No

 

Home | Competition Appeal Tribunal (catribunal.org.uk)

 

Judge just rejected another private break for confidentiality.

 

He (the judge) is now talking about the case contents.... WHOOHOO!

The judge is on the ball!

 

FFS we are back on the MA ownership chain.

 

for the 10th time

 

The tag team look ready to come on the offence shortly. Unless we break for lunch.

 

NDM definitely looks like he is getting in the game now doesn't he.

So basically this chap is saying the CAT claim is "superfluous" because the ARB case would have resolved any issues and that by the very decision itself from ARB one way or another, following the rules, would rule out wrongdoing.

 

This is actually a fair point in some respects.

 

Pretty much - I'm sure he even said that there may be a case for anti - competition, but that arbitration should be heard first

 

Finally a fact. "If the ARB concludes that KSA is not a director then the deal goes ahead".

Thus CAT isn't needed.