A commercial masterstroke, and I say that with no snide whatsoever. Having CR7 on the books will more than pay for his wages and transfer fee, and indeed will go a little bit towards chipping away at that $1bn debt. On the field, he still takes one of the best free kicks in the world and is as big an airial threat as anyone in Europe. He still keeps one or two defenders occupied at all times, and though he isn't the Ronaldo of even tive years ago, I do think he could be the same catalyst to Uniturd as Cantona was. However, he's playing for Ole - that should thankfully **** everything up.
Not what I said at all? I said Messi would suit us more (with no comments on other clubs; he might suit us more than Man U), and I'm sure Ronaldo would do a job for us. Just think Man U and Chelsea would be more suited from style of play; Man City perhaps less so but they might adjust if need be.
Sorry, I just don't really see how either of them would fit in any of the top 6 to be honest. Work rate, pressure and helping the team are a must at the top end of the prem. I'm unsure how Ronaldo standing upfront gesticulating is going to help them, it certainly wouldn't help city or Chelsea. Maybe a talisman for arsenal, bit for anybody who are decent hrs worse than what they've got.
As far as I’m aware doesn’t matter how many more shirts United sell they don’t get any extra than the 75m from Adidas. If they sel more shirts then Adidas get more money is all. not like us where we’ve taken a lower lump sum but with a % of money for shirt sales made.
Maybe not for too long. If there's a disagrement or Ron thinks he knows better, then I doubt he'll keep quiet. And who do you think the other players will look up to more? It could seriously undermine Ole.
Talking of which, I still can't get a fat bastard size in the new away shirt. Shades of the Anfield shop being closed the day after Istanbul here.
City have Jesus, or they play without a striker. Jesus vs. Ronaldo? Chelsea do have Lukaku, but Ronaldo would at the very least give them a back up. Man U have Martial, Greenwood and Cavani. I'd say Ronaldo improves them. With us he'd be replacing Firmino, whose job he couldn't or wouldn't do, or Jota, who he could replace. From a purely footballing aspect, he would be an inprovement over Origi.
The claimant would need to establish with evidence, that the publication has caused or is likely to cause serious reputational damage – this is the standard requirement of any defamation claim under section 1(1) of the Defamation Act 2013. Im Not entirely sure that a poster calling someone a rapist on a football forum sene by about 30 people would cause some serious reputations damage tbh
this is just a total lie For info Between 09 and 18, he scored 33 goals from 444 attempts 7.3% conversion. after joining Juve he scored 1 from 72 attempts which is 1.4% conversion The average conversion rate in the prem is 9.2% The Juve fans and players even openly make jokes about him not scoring from them
[QUOTE="Nozzer, post: 15141093, member: 1028101"]City have Jesus, or they play without a striker. Jesus vs. Ronaldo? Chelsea do have Lukaku, but Ronaldo would at the very least give them a back up. Man U have Martial, Greenwood and Cavani. I'd say Ronaldo improves them. With us he'd be replacing Firmino, whose job he couldn't or wouldn't do, or Jota, who he could replace. From a purely footballing aspect, he would be an inprovement over Origi.[/QUOTE]
Well, just shows what a disruptive influence Ronnie is all round. The (generally) harmless banter on here has descended into something altogether darker.
Christ sake, I can't be arsed arguing that it's a falsehood, but a 'lie'? A slight overreaction or what? Fox News stylie methinks?
Can verify this even from a fan boy point of view. His free kicks are more often than not ****, the thing is, when one does go in it's usually a screamer that gets loads of re-plays. Would much rather have Ward-prowse or Irwin taking them Man's ****ing good at penalties though, real competition for Bruno.
