Yeah - we should make crime illegal, that'll put a stop to it.
Transfer Rumours Transfer Rumours thread
- Thread starter Bozz
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Oh dear Gini….
when players say things like this, it tells you all you need to know about their egos. Nobody likes being slagged off but it must be much easier when you’re being paid silly money for doing something you love. Now run along and count your money…..you’ll soon forget the random haters
when players say things like this, it tells you all you need to know about their egos. Nobody likes being slagged off but it must be much easier when you’re being paid silly money for doing something you love. Now run along and count your money…..you’ll soon forget the random haters
- May 22, 2011
- 73,292
- 27,980
- 113
United are responsible for 4 of the top 5 prem transfers of all time in pogba maguire Sancho and Lukaku.
but then glazers are big mean owners who never invest anything
but then glazers are big mean owners who never invest anything
United are responsible for 4 of the top 5 prem transfers of all time in pogba maguire Sancho and Lukaku.
but then glazers are big mean owners who never invest anything
"Don't even paint the steel"
"Really scabby"
Seriously though, let's not forget the vastly expansive full backs, vastly expensive goalkeeper (at the time) vastly expensive flop martial (that they deny his add ons actually made him a 70mil buy) and let's never forget the sanchez free transfer that virtually paid the guy the same as messi at the time.
But no they don't even paint the steel
If we have paid Martials "add on's" then he has met expectations
I love the way your owners have built you a new stand then handed the club a re-payment schedule
They have offered to do it again too if you can afford it
- May 22, 2011
- 73,292
- 27,980
- 113
£1bn spent by glazers since fergie.. but all they do is take money out the club and never back their owners.
- May 22, 2011
- 73,292
- 27,980
- 113
If we have paid Martials "add on's" then he has met expectations
I love the way your owners have built you a new stand then handed the club a re-payment schedule
They have offered to do it again too if you can afford it
Yet LFC fans aren’t protesting outside the ground, breaking into the stadium and causing damage, assaulting police officers and forcing games to be postponed to get them out the club.
Makes you wonder
In fairness to the mancs they only did that the once and despite all the opportunities that they had, they "refrained"
- May 22, 2011
- 73,292
- 27,980
- 113
Yep sure does.
You used to be so militant before Maggie closed your docks
I wasn’t alive and don’t live in Liverpool so I used to be nothing then…
If we have paid Martials "add on's" then he has met expectations
I love the way your owners have built you a new stand then handed the club a re-payment schedule
They have offered to do it again too if you can afford it
Bless.
Last I heard he had made all but the golden balloon nomination yet some manc I hear would say he was really cheap and you never paid out.
You paid 20mil then a second installment of 30, then 10mil when he score 25 league goals and 10mil when he got 25 French caps.
70mil.
Irrespective of what you call your great expectations.
After that what the dickens are you on about with fsg. They have not even offered us a penny for the anfield raid end. We have to pay out of club funds.
I suggest you focus on invading the pitch on your first league game in pretest at the glaziers and leave us to our absentee landlords.
In theory you egg form was still in your.mothers ovaries though. Don't run yourself down mate
Are you a bit special or something?
They weren't my expectations
All i have done is pointed out that if we have paid £70m then he has reached the terms of the deal, it's not hard to understand.
Nice of you to let me know what the terms were though, i can never be arsed looking at **** like that because it means **** all to me
Are you a bit special or something?
They weren't my expectations
All i have done is pointed out that if we have paid £70m then he has reached the terms of the deal, it's not hard to understand.
Nice of you to let me know what the terms were though, i can never be arsed looking at **** like that because it means **** all to me
Lols
That's the best effort you have, your club vastly vastly overpaid for martial.
Plus it was you who brought up our owners and stadium in the first place
Classic
Da **** you on aboutLols
That's the best effort you have, your club vastly vastly overpaid for martial.
Plus it was you who brought up our owners and stadium in the first place
Classic
We paid what we agreed for Martial so he met the criteria.
When it comes to owners then we are both in the ****, our's take hundreds of millions out of the club (though in fairness leave enough in to buy who we want and even "vastly" overpay, but have done little with the ground.
Your's leave you with a minimal budget (unless you have a player sale windfall) and do bits to your ground then present you with the bill.
None of us are winners here mate
Da **** you on about
We paid what we agreed for Martial so he met the criteria.
When it comes to owners then we are both in the ****, our's take hundreds of millions out of the club (though in fairness leave enough in to buy who we want and even "vastly" overpay, but have done little with the ground.
Your's leave you with a minimal budget (unless you have a player sale windfall) and do bits to your ground then present you with the bill.
None of us are winners here mate
- May 22, 2011
- 73,292
- 27,980
- 113
Da **** you on about
We paid what we agreed for Martial so he met the criteria.
When it comes to owners then we are both in the ****, our's take hundreds of millions out of the club (though in fairness leave enough in to buy who we want and even "vastly" overpay, but have done little with the ground.
Your's leave you with a minimal budget (unless you have a player sale windfall) and do bits to your ground then present you with the bill.
None of us are winners here mate
Which makes you wonder why United fans are so unhappy with owners when they back every single manager they’ve had and pump more money into the club for transfers than any club bar city? So what they take money out? The clubs a business, if you make 200m and they take out 50m and leave united with 150m to reinvest surely that’s better than the club making 100m and them taking nothing and leaving united with 100m to invest?
They don't pump money in, they take it out and have no interest in the club
Nice to know you are happy with FSG though, that sell to buy policy has always done you well.
just ask Rafa
- May 22, 2011
- 73,292
- 27,980
- 113
They don't pump money in, they take it out and have no interest in the club
Nice to know you are happy with FSG though, that sell to buy policy has always done you well.
just ask Rafa
So how do you spend £73m on Sancho then? You think Ole funded it himself?
And yeah pretty happy with FSG. Helped us win a champ league and league title in last 3 years. Can’t complain with that.
Was the dickens and great expectations deliberate?