Bowen is ****, please god hope that its all rumours. He's a forward that has scored 9 goals in two seasons with Wham and they want at least £35m for him, NO thank you. Watkins is slightly better but is inconsistent. Neither are good enough for a team that plans to title challenge, neither are any better than Shaq or Origi, both would cost a bomb with the 'English player tax' Smells of FSG telling Klopp et al to lower spending expectations and look in the baragin bucket, especially over potential wage demands.
Could be a good buy. Very cheap and the lad has shown that he could be a good player with the right manager to get the best out of him
everton fans are already hopping mad as they say they should have at least 3 or 4 top class wingers if they are going to play with 2 wide men and these ****e buys of rafa's are only going to block the young talent coming through and do nothing to improve the team as they will still have the yard dog as one wide man but townsend and gray are rubbish that doesn't help
brighton have done it again Tino Livramento (what a name for a little cheslea chav RB) has been paoched for cheslea and he is one of their very much brightest youth prospects. He was their academy poty last year but can play RB or RM exactly the same as lampety who could now move to RW for the brighton team. BTW he is also a short arse so brighton will have a midget right side to their team. Brighton love a chelsea bargain and youth buys in general these days, they are turning into the next Bounemouth in that regard (prob end up going down as well)
spurs have also grabbed gil from sevilla and we are seeing the back of the notorious diver lamela who is part of some swap deal. incidentally this means the "magnificent 7" signed with the bale money have all not officially flopped and left that club.
One Lunatic said Liverpool would suit Harry Kane than either Chelsea or Manchester City. What has he been smoking?.
It's all nonsense. Kane has shown two ways to play but is not quick. Hes dropped deep and enabled players to go beyond him and that's a major step up for him and hes shown as a central no 9 that he scores goals. Kane would not suit city that much imo but I think Guardiola could get a tune out if him and kdb. Chelsea dont give a **** and it's all about Abramovich's latest fantasy. We all know that is haaland. Kane for lfc. It just make no sense as it's not about in possession positioning etc it's about pressing and leading that system and self sacrifice. I just dont see kane in that way
yeah it did i suppose but oddly for a spursy club like spurs i suppose none of them didnt anything but exactly what they were expected to do. Bale and modric and kane just don't fit as they deliver actual performance.
just another quick rumour, the buss seat sniffers who pass themselves off as ITK these days are adamant that the haaland deal is done for chelsea and right now all thats happening is deals for abraham to arsenal and other such things to clear the way.
So that's their shiny new toy sorted for this season. Be a good addition to the league and also interesting to see if he flops or flourishes. I don't recall him playing well against us
It’s the enormity of the investments that concerns me. Chelsea, City and Utd will all spend very big. We will fall further behind if not competing for some of the better players…. unless we sign Mbappe and then I’m talking sh*t, obvs
It's not what you have it's how you use it We will never be competing money wise with the big spenders but we know how to win games and trophies and leagues. It's what we do.
