Yes. Decisions in arbitration are legally binding if they form part of the ratio decidendi (judgement). If the panel makes comments obiter dicta (in passing as a recommendation/ suggestion in practice) then no.
We may have lost the plot, but some of us knew in the beginning and they've calculated the end correctly.
Am I right in thinking thst the club, by extending the accounting period for 2019/ until the end of July 20, has in effect extended the 2020/1 period until the end of July 21?
And? Seriously though that’s the reason the test needs revamping and why an independent body should conduct the test.