I'll take your word for it, but just exterminating them would be my policy if I was at no 10 that's for sure
No further action . A woman who was arrested in connection with the disappearance and death of Sarah Everard faces no further action, the Met Police has said. Ms Everard's body was found in woodland in Kent more than a week after she was last seen in south London. The woman, in her 30s, was arrested on 9 March on suspicion of assisting an offender and had been bailed until early June. The Met said she had been "released with no further action" being taken.
Yeh kinda restores your faith a little. It did make me wonder whether phrases like "released with no further action" or "not enough evidence to prosecute" etc by the police are deliberate to make out "yeh they were involved but we can't prove it".
No further action is just standard terminology I believe. And the vast majority who receive that would be innocent of any crime.
All it means is legally there’s nothing suggesting and no reason to believe she had anything to do with the crime, or knew about it and/or this guy’s intentions. She got involved with him and he ended up doing this so whether she saw any red flags in his behaviour, or anything off in his character prior to these actions, is on her conscience, but if it’s not directly related to this case then it’s immaterial and something she’ll have to live with.
Don't know if anyone else has followed this story, but she's been given bail... https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...n-given-bail-in-belize-over-officers-shooting
I can't see the tweet as it's asking me to login and I'm not on twatter, but if it's about the cop then I don't know for sure. I personally see it as a copper who lost complete control and then his true character come out as the red mist descended and he tasered the bloke for 30+ second and booted him in the head. And even though the copper's a **** for it, there's a fine line between thuggery and wanting to kill the bloke. I'm not sure he wanted to kill him is all's I'm saying.
I think it sends out a clear message at last to cops, that Jury's will send them to prison for their actions. There is also another side of the coin, if I was cop and someone was off their head, surely it's easier to turn around, and walk straight back out the door, and say I'm not paid enough to deal with this shhite. I copied this from wiki... Police had responded to a call as Atkinson threatened to kill his father, Ernest. Atkinson's older brother Kenroy said "My brother had lost it. He was in a manic state and depressed – out of his mind and ranting. He had a tube in his shoulder for the dialysis and he had ripped it out and was covered in blood. He got dad by the throat and said he was going to kill him. He told dad he had already killed me, our brother Paul and sister Elaine and he had come for him." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalian_Atkinson Fight or flight.....we never know how people are going to react in any given situation, regardless of the hours of training they receive. According to wiki, those comments were made by his older brother, if I've read it right, someone who knew the victim, if he couldn't handle him, what was the expectation.... If you was a paramedic, would you want to walk into that scene. The copper used brutality, that is totally and utterly wrong, imho, he should have turned around and ran instead, and been labelled a coward and neglective of his duty to protect others. Far better than commiting murder, albeit another life may have been lost instead, that of his father.
How much of him being an ex-professional footballer playing for a well known club got the case to trial? I only say that in relation to your first sentence. There are so many similar cases and it's always brushed under the carpet. Much as I'd like to think this will change things I don't think it will.
I hear what you are saying mate, but I'm wondering when the time will come, that a cop will say fook it and walk away. Do they really get paid enough, for a throw of the die for a game of live or die. That's not defending the cop but the predicament a person can be faced with, you don't have to wear a uniform. Much like the security that didn't stop the Manchester bomber, now what IF one of them knew it was a bomb he had....they now have a choice, fight or flight or maybe do nothing? I don't know if the comments on wiki are even true, but if they are, read them again and imagine walking into a situation that the older brother couldn't handle. A game of Russian roulette, do you take the chance he won't kill the father and try and talk them down, or maybe you calmly back away instead, with a final choice, go hell for leather and nullify the risk, what would a soldier do. The Westminster attacker had about a dozen bullets pumped in him, why, he never had a REAL bomb? All risks we ask those to protect us to measure, sadly the cop chose to murder the guy, only he knows his real intentions, but it still comes back to my question......when does a cop walk away and say fook it, he values his or her life to.
Radio conversation between a constable and his sergeant Sergeant....How are you doing with that domestic lad Constable......Lady here has stabbed her husband to death because he walked into the kitchen with his boots on when she had just mopped the floor Sergeant.....So have you taken her into custody? Constable....Not yet Serg, the floors still wet.
