If you're trying to make a case that driving is safe without people speeding then you're surely an ostrich. You can be killed by something less intelligent than an idiot... A tree for example, a sign coming off in the wind and decapiting you, the car malfunctioning, an unseen pothole, bad weather, sink holes, cattle on the road, falling asleep, a heart attack, a jackknifed lorry, ice, cyclists and countless other things make the roads incredibly dangerous.
Almost all of those things can you kill you outside of a car too. Driving in this country is relatively safe and no more dangerous than most other activities. Accidents can happen in a car even when you are driving safely, though that usually involves somebody else driving like an idiot. Things like potholes and mechanical breakdown shouldn't kill you if you are driving safely and have the driving abilities and hazard awareness that you should have to be on the roads. When it comes to flying debris in the wind then I'd prefer to be inside a car than walking outside of it. And the point about driving above 70mph was that you said it was dangerous between 20 and 70, so just a **** joke
You're trying to back out of a ridiculous position mate just like your dreadful driving ability. There's not many things more dangerous than roads why are you trying to argue with that Driving and cycling is not safe on roads full stop.
I am not backing out of any position. I haven't changed my mind on anything. Driving is no more dangerous than many other activities in day to day life. Of any danger that is there, nearly all of it is caused by people not driving properly. The statistics back this up too. 0.00242% of the UK population are killed on our roads each year. That includes all forms of road deaths - driving, cycling, pedestrians. That makes the roads in the UK the 5th safest place in the world to drive/cycle/walk by death rate. It also means the death rate on our roads is only 70.55% of the death rate of injuries sustained in other activities, which has an annual death rate of 0.00343%
You're wrong then. Driving is the most dangerous thing you'll so every day. You've also now went from taking issue with me saying removing idiots won't make it safe to say in its dangerous. You're all over the place here
Mate if you took every idiot off the roads its still very dangerous. Why on earth are you even contesting that? It's also still far more dangerous than running the bath or boiling the kettle
Without idiots on the road the death rate would be even smaller than it is now. More people die from trips and falls than road related deaths every year. More people die from other leisure activities than road related deaths every year.
Of course they'd be less dangerous I never presented an argument otherwise. I simply advised Warm Pouch the roads would be far fro.m safe and up you popped in your BMW getting in the ****ing road as usual. The roads are dangerous with or without idiots
They are already relatively safe, even with the idiots on the road, compared to other activities we do. That is my point. I don't drive a BMW and never have
Mate driving a vehicle is not safe man... The roads are incredibly dangerous Flying 30000 ft above the ground is safer
If driving is dangerous then I hope you never walk. Walking (anywhere) is 41.7% more likely to kill you due to trips and falls than driving, cycling or crossing a road. If I was you I would stay locked in your bunker and never come out. Life will be much safer that way
The roads are not safe... You've now started the whataboutery which doesn't make the roads any safer. There's thousands of people that have died on the roafs due to something known as an accident. You seem to be living in some fantasy world where if you're sensible a branch can't go through your gullet or you can't fall asleep at the wheel crash and burn to death.
You're talking ****e. Driving a moving object at speed's of 70 mph isn't safe I know someone that died because they hit black ice and they weren't an idiot. If you want to get into numbers about what's safer or not that's a seperate argument that I never went into. I'll say it once more just to be clear as to how this started The roads would still be dangerous without idiots. Yes or no?
The fact you know someone who died through hitting black ice is a genuine tragedy that I wouldn't want to make light of. That in itself doesn't make the activity inherently dangerous though. I know someone who died in a crush at the Monsters of Rock festival at Donnington Park in the 1980s. I know someone else who died walking home from the pub and who fell into a 6 inch deep stream and drowned. Both were tragedies, but I wouldn't say going to music festivals or walking home from the pub were inherently dangerous. There are risks associated with absolutely anything in life and tragedies happen. We make risk assessments everyday in everything we do. Those risks don't make an activity inherently dangerous. So in answer to your question. I believe there are dangers on the road as with everything else in life. I don't believe roads are inherently dangerous though. Deaths on the road are almost always down to driver, rider or pedestrian error. I don't think roads are particularly dangerous to be on now. Without people making errors they would be almost completely safe barring a few random accidents (such as falling trees) that are just as dangerous in or out of a car.
For what it's worth, I actually missed a zero out of those figures. It's 0.000242% of the population who die on our roads each year.
You're talking a load of ****e. At the core of this you're trying to argue that driving is safe without idiots and you're wrong. It's very dangerous
That is your opinion and not a fact. My opinion is that you're wrong. I would suggest the facts back up my opinion too. Driving is a safe activity when road users use the road properly. If it is so dangerous, why do you do it?
