Not my figures mate but a quick search and... Wan-Bissaka - £45m Shaw - £30m Lindelöf - £30m Bailly - £30m ... that's £135m, not miles away is it? And that's ignoring the add-ons they may or may not have incurred.
Here's a stat I bet nobody was aware of Since the clocks went forward in March Newcastle are the top scoring team in the PL
Fat Sams whole existence in management is to **** up anything Liverpool. Little fat saf wannabee **** he is. And with 10 cbs... He won't disappoint.
Not a problem for city, sell him for 20m or leave him in the reserves. Either way another 50m cb comes in.
Don't know why you gave me these figures mate, unlike you I really don't care, I just said you need to up your game, you wrongly assumed I was actually interested. I only gave you the Maguire figure because I know it makes good bait, how sad are Liverpool supporters, that you actually went away to look up their price tags, please tell me you didn't know them off the top of your head, please no. Edit: Just re-read, you did look them up!
I knew them off the top of my head. I also knew your Maguire intervention was twaddle. I know that's sad, but perhaps you don't realise that being shown up on this forum again for not knowing your stuff is even sadder.
I know very little about the Premier League and am happy for it to remain so. Whereas Liverpool fans naturally and quite rightly know every little detail about it and their opposition, afterall the Prem was built around them. Big Six bro, has a certain twang to it.
Too right I didn't. He was so not bothered in proving my lack of education, that he went away and googled their transfer fees
Okay, you were wrong and was proven so, but what have you to say over the main point of the post? : Liverpool have been without Van Djik and Gomez for most of the season, but the post-match analysis on Sky focussed solely on how poor United had missed Maguire for three games, and were thus unable to adapt and defend adequately? Not enough positive stokes from the gallery in going down that road?
