I have seen the light brothers and this is the church for me from now on [video=youtube;HFg60vyjblQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFg60vyjblQ&feature=related[/video] p.s. no touts accepted in this church
its semantics because you know what the topic is, as you cant answer it you getting pedantic over words. we are not talking of transformation, if ideed you mean from the biology angle. The question isnt about cells changing/altering The question was about origins/creation of the cells not what happened once they appeared lord of the worldsif you read the tafsir is basically that the Quran recognizes, prophesies even, the existence of other solar systems, planets, and earth-like worlds
I simply asked the question. didnt 'chuck in' and claimed anything I answered direct questions, which is not the same thing neither is what I have said on other threads. I genuinely wanted to know what athiests 'believed'. seems they get very uncomfortable
It's clearly not semantics. Creation implies that something has been created and that there's a creator. There's no proof of either. I've openly stated that there's no reliable answer to your question at the moment too, so why would I hide behind semantics? I'm talking about matter and energy changing form. They cannot be destroyed or created, as far as we know. I'm sure that you have an example of this, then.
The atheists on here don't get uncomfortable with your questions, they're annoyed with your implications and apparent ignorance of the science that you dismiss. As are some of the theists, I may add.
yes, do you read arabic rabba la ala min - roughly translated means lord of the worlds. The word for worlds means all possible worlds known to exist. in fact the words comes from the root verb "to know". the worlds means different planets, even parallel universes as in the 'many worlds' theory which some physicists seem to like at the moment. alternatively you could look it up
what implications? how have you reached that conclusion how can I dismiss something which yu yourself have said doesnt currently exist?
And yet you went straight back to talking about creation again afterwards, with your next question, which made absolutely no sense without that word. There are plenty of answers. I don't believe that any of them are reliable, yours included. Who says that it came from anywhere? We've no evidence that it's possible to create or destroy matter, so why should we assume that it can be done? No. The Quran wasn't written in the current form of Arabic though, so we'll both have to work with translations, won't we? You really are just making this stuff up now. Prove this is true.
