Looks like the witness has just got in trouble, seems like he expressed an opinion/conclusion rather than fact. Judges are picky about this sort of stuff.
I always wondered what the killer cop was glaring at in his moment of madness. Now we know, the witness had just said to the killer cop the name of that choke hold. It's obviously at that moment the killer cop has realised he's fooked up in front of some one that knows martial arts.
Yeah. You can only say what you saw, not what you thought was happening. I know it's only day one, but I just cannot see anyway this cop is going to get off. I expect it will be down to what all the medical people say, and police training instructors. In my mind it's murder, he knew he was killing the guy, that's why he stared at the witness, when the witness said what he was doing - it was the only time the killer cops attention was distracted.
Well have to wait and see mate, like was said earlier in here I certainly wouldn't bet my stash on on a conviction. But it's hard to see how anyone can watch that and say the force used for 9 plus minutes was necessary. Once he's cuffed and face down on the floor with several other officers there by then, then he's under control and the same force is no longer necessary. Look I know its in court and that with all the rules and laws and training experts and such but don't tell me as a human being that your heart doesn't sink at how wrong that whole vid is. Thats enough for me. Obviously the law is a different story though.
At least like this, we all get a chance to see what's going on in the court. I understand visual things like that more, than I do reading something out of media sources you've constantly got to check.
I watch a channel called court cam a lot but its short shows and mainly peeps doing batshit crazy things in court
Nah defo intent, unless a psychologist can prove his mental state was some where it shouldn't be, like when psychos get pleasure out of killing. I can't think what the term is called. Captain Chaos will know.
