If he gets to the point of paying obese women to punch him in the bollocks, and to park their breakfast on top of a glass coffee table, whilst he fiddles with his cocktail sausage, I’ll defo call an intervention mate. #postcodesafe
From his opinions on the overrated thread this doesn't sound like something that would appeal to him ... or if it did he would want the quicky version.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...ken-bones-at-bristol-protest?CMP=share_btn_tw So...the old bill lied about the violence from demonstrators....well I never
They dress like robo cops but do a ****ing Neymar ffs. There's plenty of video's flying around that shows them behaving appallingly in Bristol. I particularly liked the one of the macho twat ordering some journalists to disperse and shoving one and threatening them with force even after they clearly identified themselves and showed their NUJ cards...all caught on video...thick mofo.
Not really sure what the Guardian is trying to prove. To quote an article of 12 years ago in relation to Bristol, seems strange to me, why not compare it to the leniency shown in the statue removal. Fact was the media did show footage of a building being damaged and vehicles being damaged or set a light, in my eyes that's thuggery or at the very least criminal damage.
Was only interested in the complete lack of punctured lungs and broken bones which the media were all reporting as fact. Find it hard to take the guardian seriously since they grassed on a woman who told them about nuclear weapons being placed here at Greenham Common in the 1980s. They were ordered to give up their sources but refused until they faced jail so they grassed on her instead and she was jailed. Think her name was sara tisdale but can't be sure.
I would agree with the points about the method of policing and I'm also against the bill the government are trying to put through. If it was me, I'd have protests managed in the same way as football matches today, by stewards, we need to remove the target to hate, which is the police. Back in the 70's the police always managed football crowds, today a lot of that has been removed. As long as a protest has an event organiser(s) and named stewards, all who can be held accountable, then I see no need for the police to be there in any large numbers. Then the protestors can't blame the police for what happens. The method worked with the Bristol statues, and they still arrested people at a later date, due to cctv images etc. The problem is the coronavirus has allowed our freedoms to eroded, so people are going to be very sensitive at the mo. We need to take the heat out of these situations, and that means the police stepping back a bit. If virus rules get broken, so be it.
It's on SKY News mate. Just been listening to the prosecution laying out how this is going to run. The defence attorney is up now. Can't see how this cop is going to get off, but if he does you can be sure it will kick off big time. Will be LA riots all over again.
Defence guy has only been up 5 mins and I'm bored with him all ready. Prosecution guy was very clear and concise.
Also on Abcs tube channel mate. Can't see him getting off but if he does my days it will kick the **** off like never seen before you're right about that.
I'd find him guilty just for the tie his defence guy is wearing. Lots of mumberling, maybe he think's he is Columbo.
Too much talking, explaining the same things slightly differently on repeat, makes me suspicious of what he's saying.
I can’t imagine there was a long queue of quality barristers eager to take on that case tbf like. I’ve not been following it, which degree of murder is he being prosecuted for in the end? Or have they hedged their bets and gone for 2 options?
