Indeed, I'd ride her too as i've said before but she's an evil duplicitous lying whore harpie with the blood of an innocent girl on her hands. Now she will make a fortune off the story of an innocent abroad framed by corrupt cops. Hopefully justice will be done and she will meet a grisly end the evil slag.
Why did she name an innocent man as the murderer? Who made it look like the flat had been broken into when it had not? Wake up and smell the coffee, next you'll be saying OJ was innocent too.
Almost 70 posts in this topic and I refrained from comment, only to find some idiot of a Rangers fan brings me into it. I have to confess I almost agree with Trevor Santos, yesterday he said if Rangers go down that will be the end of Scottish Football. That's is the kernel of what is wrong with Scottish Football. The Rangers club is, (according to Rangers and the Scottish Authorities), Scottish Football. Wrong Trevor Scottish Football consists of all the SPL clubs, the other Senior Leagues and all the Junior clubs. However, I know what you mean't to say was that the fall of Rangers would be the end of Scottish Football as we know it. Isn't that right Trevor. No more bigotry, cheating, teams not playing their best players, teams not trying and finally no more partial referees and assistants. How wonderful it will be, the new era of Scottish Football.
I dont care how she acted or what she did. there was zero evidence connecting her to the crime. That black guy did it and he's in jail for it.
If you "don't care" then why are you pleading her innocence? Or is it that you simply don't care whether she's guilty or not? That's a pretty sad thing to say.
she's not guilty. FACT you cant convict someone of murder if they act a bit strange. maybe you should do some research on Paolo Micheli the nutcase of a judge that pushed for her to be charged with the murder
Here are some established“facts” about the case Nev. Knox confessed that she was in the house on the night of the murder and that she heard Miss Kercher scream, identifying a Congolese bar owner, Patrick Lumumba, as the assailant. She told the court during the trial that the confession was made under duress but then repeated the entire account in a five page memorandum the next morning. She then changed her story and said the Police “assaulted” her to make her name Lumumba. She is being sued by the Italian Police for defamation. The prosecution said the fact that Knox falsely accused Lumumba of being the killer was a sign of her own guilt and an attempt to throw them off her trail. He was arrested in a dawn raid by armed police and spent two weeks in jail. It was only by chance that a Swiss businessman read about the case and came forward to say he had been talking to Lumumba in his bar on the night of the murder — offering him a rock-solid alibi. Lumumba says Knox nearly ruined his life and is suing her for defamation. Rafael Sollecito could not back up Knox’s alibi on the night of the murder. She claimed she spent the evening with him, smoking marijuana, watching the French film Amelie and making love. But Sollecito told police he could not remember if Knox was with him that evening or not. Even assuming his memory was hazy because of the drugs, it seemed odd that a young man who had just embarked on a new relationship could not recall whether he had spent the night with his girlfriend or not. Sollecito claimed he used his computer to download and watch cartoons and Amelie. But computer experts told the court that there was no activity on his laptop between 9.10pm on Nov 1, and 5.32am the next morning — the time frame in which the murder took place. Knox and Sollecito turned off their mobile phones on the night of the murder, from around 8.40pm, and turned them back on at around 6am, inviting further suspicion. A bedroom belonging to one of Miss Kercher’s Italian flatmates was ransacked on the night of the murder, with a window smashed with a rock. But police said the break-in was staged - broken glass from the window was found on top of clothes scattered on the floor, suggesting the window was broken after the contents of the room were messed up. Prosecutors accused Knox and her boyfriend of staging the break-in to make the killing look like a burglary that had turned into rape and murder. Why would someone who had no access to the flat attempt to make it look like a break in if it was in fact a break in? Surely the only people who would attempt to fool the police into making it look like a burglary were people who DID have access to the flat? She is a proven Liar and I would not trust a word she says, neither would anyone with an ounce of sense.
a forced confession in italy? surely not I have to say these facts are pretty ****. 2 stoners mix their stories up? shock horror
I have found the evidence that should be used against her: SHE IS A TIM!!! please log in to view this image
No, refuted by a court of law, that's why she got 3 years for slandering Lmumba. I told you to read up before committing yourself did I not?
she was also found guilty of murder by a court of law, so were the west memphis 3. are they also guilty?
