Strange time to change. City don't look 100%, by any means.
My old accounts must be on here somewhere, and I dont really want to read my old posts.I believe Liverpool was invaded by Vikings and Irishmen.
@Hoddle is a god this is still the same one goingMy old accounts must be on here somewhere, and I dont really want to read my old posts.
Yep.
If you were to draw up a list of iconic threads on this site, this would feature in the top 5, I reckon.
You misspelled moronic![]()
Come off it!
When I created that thread, Mousers poured onto it like rabbits at a ****fest. I created that thread because the Mouser mods banned me from their board when I was ripping the.... er... I mean, telling the truth about 'Pool under Benitez, and then the silly ****ers flooded onto my freshly created Mouser Watch thread.
It's a thing of legend, and we both know that.

I mean... Do you even care?Once a mouse............................
You must log in or register to see mediaYou must log in or register to see media
If he's getting money from central government yes I do.I mean... Do you even care?
Fair play, fight that good fightIf he's getting money from central government yes I do.
This might make you feel better about that Smithy.Palace 0 Liverpool 7. See Spurs.This is why we don't win championships. Liverpool make,what? 10 plus chances,score 7. We had the same v Palace and scored 1. We go to Anfield,create more chances,score 1.Liverpool,less chances,score 2. 6 points to Liverpool and 1 for us. Over to you Jose!!!!
Possession stats are one thing, but when we're so incapable of holding onto the ball we aimlessly hoof it up the pitch as we did for large chunks of the second half on Wednesday that's quite anotherI don't take a lot of notice of figures. I mean a team could get the ball and just pass it around to one another,backwards and forwards. That would show up as a lot of possesion by that team getting nowhere,whereas the other team could make two passes and be attacking the other goal.