You must log in or register to see media
Yeah.
You must log in or register to see media
For the masochists.


See, this is the sort of **** from Mourinho that I don't like. Son was poor. Hojbjerg was poor. The whole team was poor.Tottenham manager Jose Mourinho, asked what he learnt from his side tonight, said: "Nothing new really. The fact that the Europa League group phase doesn't motivate some of the players, I knew it.
"That some players are fundamental for us and I always need on the pitch in any circumstance, a couple of these players to give a little bit of balance to the team.
"As an example, (Pierre-Emile) Hojbjerg and Sonny, without them I don't think we would have a positive result. Nothing really that I learn. The players know and I share my feelings with them, I am normally right.
"When I saw the warm-up before the game I had a feeling and I told the players before the game that there was a huge difference in intensity, communication and enthusiasm in their warm-up and our warm-up because I was looking at both. Nothing surprises me."
Our team at home is a different team," added Mourinho.
"When we go to Antwerp, to Ludogrets, to LASK, the stadium, the weather, the emptiness, the atmosphere - I have a feeling, which is not a feeling, it's experience, that some of the players, they feel that they shouldn't be here.
"But the contradiction on that, is that players like Son and Pierre [Hojbjerg], players starting every match, are the examples of the guys that it doesn't matter where, doesn't matter the competition, they are there. And they are there for the team all the time."
See, this is the sort of **** from Mourinho that I don't like. Son was poor. Hojbjerg was poor. The whole team was poor.
He got the team selection and tactics wrong and that's why we didn't play well. It wasn't all down to the players, let alone their attitude.
We lost the midfield because he played two attacking midfielders and used one of them deep, which made him anonymous.
Croydon pointed out that error before the kick-off and I assumed that's not what we'd be doing, so it wasn't a surprise.
We then played lots of high balls up to Son, which didn't suit him at all and lead to it coming back all day long.
This wasn't an exact replica of the Antwerp match, but he got that one wrong, too.
It took him ages to get over that and he blamed the players, which lead to him making the same mistakes again for this one.
His team selection and tactics have to work or it's on him.
I think that it could work, but not with Lo Celso in the deeper role and not when both he and Ndombele aren't up 100%.All season I’ve been reading that he should play GLC-Ndombele-Hojberg and tonight he did
In the wrong positions, as Lo Celso was a CM and Ndombele as an AMAll season I’ve been reading that he should play GLC-Ndombele-Hojberg and tonight he did
In the wrong positions, as Lo Celso was a CM and Ndombele as an AM
It's not the only time we've played GLC as a CM this season, but the fact we keep doing it is merging his goal/assist potential due to playing him so deep
The likely explanation is that Gio is a pitbull when the opponents have the ball while Ndombele isn't, so the logic is having Gio as a CM helps our low block as he's closing down opponentsI don’t get it at all. Gio is a capable dribbler from deep but offers far more around the box than Tanguy, he’s used to playing that bit further forward like he did at Betis and I think he’s got the ability to do some damage playing more like a 10. Tanguy’s close control and ability to beat his markers on a sixpence then immediately pass the ball into the final 3rd or carry it there himself is so much more valuable to us in a deep position than when he plays too far forward.
I understand why Tanguy is the most advanced when we play PEH and Sissoko with him, but when we play Gio then Tanguy needs to come deeper.
The likely explanation is that Gio is a pitbull when the opponents have the ball while Ndombele isn't, so the logic is having Gio as a CM helps our low block as he's closing down opponents
The problem with this logic is that it's nonsensical, as we're playing somebody whose role is to link midfield and attack while chipping in with some goals too deep to do any of that - and it gets even more ridiculous when he's deployed as an ersatz DM, which is how he was used against Antwerp where he played deeper than Winks did
Sissoko clearly just has a natural fitness thatNDombeleeverybody else in the world doesn’t have

I think we should give him some slack. His mind was elsewhere.
You must log in or register to see images