An MP has been handed a lifetime ban from the pubs, bars and clubs in the town he represents after backing the recent 10pm coronavirus curfew. Andy Carter, who was elected as Warrington South’s Conservative MP last year, will be barred from 30 of the town’s venues after a backlash from the local Pubwatch group, the Warrington Guardian reports. After a unanimous vote to ban him, members said Carter had shown the industry “no support” and that the curfew has “absolutely killed us”. They also questioned the evidence provided by the government to support the policy. https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/ukne...backing-10pm-curfew/ar-BB1aXOos?ocid=msedgdhp
Govt say 'false positive rate is 0.5%' Liverpool tested 90k people and had a positivity rate of 0.7% That means that over half the folk who tested positive were indeed false positives. This is absolutely insane. Get these authoritarian ****ers so far to ****!!! Destroying the country for nothing! Absolutely nothing other than to increase the State's intrusion into our lives. OPEN YOUR EYES YOU SPASTIC BASTARDS!!
False positives are around 50% imo making the test almost useless. All these people catching it twice isn't true, you can't catch it twice and you can take that to the bank.
MP’s Served Notice of Private Criminal Prosecution For Pandemic Fraud Here lies the Notice of Intended Private Criminal Prosecution, which was served upon every serving MP by email this morning, for and on behalf of the British people. NOTICE OF INTENDED PRIVATE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION Dear Sirs, You are hereby served notice that it is my intention to lay information in a Private Criminal Prosecution against yourselves, alleging that the following crimes have been committed against the British people: 1. Section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006 has been repeatedly breached in the enactment of the Coronavirus Act 2020 [the CV Act] – an act which was founded upon a series of dishonest statements relied upon by every serving MP. Namely: a. That there was a genuine public health emergency, which justified the draconian measures taken. b. That there was a legal basis for such an act to be passed into law. c. That there was no viable alternative course of action that could be taken to “flatten the curve” of alleged COVID-19 deaths. 2. In addition, the CV Act unlawfully purports to have suspended the democratic right of every Briton to remove the government from office, as well as the individual rights guaranteed by the Common Law, which are beyond the jurisdiction of the legislature. 3. The CV Act also purports to have legislated for the falsification of death certificates, which has enabled the government to grossly inflate the number of people who have reportedly died of the COVID-19 virus, which in any event has never actually been proven to exist. 4. Nevertheless, the ONS data shows that the government policy which was enabled by the CV Act doubled the average five year UK mortality rate, which is considered tantamount to genocide under international law, when the fatal refusal of care to patients in care homes and hospitals is taken into account. 5. Furthermore, the enactment of the CV Act also comprises a fundamental breach of the Treason Felony Act 1848, in that it treasonously purports to authorise ministers of the Crown to govern the People by royal decree or proclamation, which is strictly prohibited by articles 1 and 2 of the Bill of Rights 1689. 6. In any event, as Lord Coke, the draftsman of the Petition of Right, said in the 1610 decision of Thomas Bonham v College of Physicians 8 Co Rep 107a; 77 Eng Rep 638, commonly known as Dr. Bonham’s Case, in the Court of Common Pleas: “In many cases, the common law will control Acts of Parliament, and sometimes adjudge them to be utterly void: for when an Act of Parliament is against common right and reason, or repugnant, or impossible to be performed, the common law will control it and adjudge such an Act to be void.” Should you collectively move to set aside the act which the Common Law ajudges to be repugnant, as well as void ab initio, as per the Dr Bonham case, no later than the midnight on the 2/10/2020, this action will be suspended. However, in the event you fail to do so, for any reason whatsoever, a QC and legal team will be engaged to lay the information before a court of competent jurisdiction at the earliest opportunity and the Private Criminal Prosecution will commence. Please be advised that a Grand Jury of the People has already determined that there is sufficient evidence to indict every MP for fraud, treason and genocide. This is your last chance to leave your mark on the right side of history because there is no jury that would not convict every complicit member of Parliament on the charges that will be laid. Nevertheless, I trust you will see the devastating error you have made, before it is too late. Yours sincerely, [Name Redacted] For & on behalf of the British People – All Rights Reserved https://www.thebernician.net/mps-served-notice-of-private-criminal-prosecution-for-pandemic-fraud/
Favourite of Not 606 - Amanda Knox - was found not guilty (twice) because one of the highest courts in Europe decided that PCR tests were not fit for purpose, and could identify anything, in anyone, anywhere - if amplified enough times. We are in the midst of a false-positive pseudo-pandemic with no excess deaths anywhere in Europe at this time of year! FTP
Yep. LCN DNA profiling can be an irreproducible technique for two distinct reasons. First, because the sample is too small for conventional testing in the first place, it is usually consumed and destroyed in the course of performing the LCN test. No sample, no reproducibility. Second, the test results that are produced contain this strong, random variability. If you perform LCN DNA profiling on ten identical samples, you can get ten different profiles, each differing from the others because of amplification of statistical flukes. In addition to the issue of reproducibility, LCN DNA is simply a very new technique, and that should prompt caution. In fact, most researchers in the field fill their papers with appropriate caveats about the need for further development, and further testing before the technique is widely used. Conventional DNA profiling has been rigorously tested, reproducibly performed in many laboratories around the world, and validated with carefully designed control tests. With LCN DNA profiling, no such body of controlled tests yet exists. The method is too new, too quirky, and too unreliable to be safely used until it is much better understood. http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/MarkWaterbury.html
We went in to lock down at tier one having been among the lowest in the Country, and we've already been told we're coming out in tier three and have just been knocked of the top of the league by Oldham. That worked then.
