Off Topic US Election

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Quill said:
If there's clear fraud going on... then why would the Democrats allow the Senate to likely stay Republican? Why rig an election in a way that keeps the opposition from stopping you making any changes?

There hasn't been any sudden addition at all, one site made a typing error and now suddenly it's a ****ing conspiracy - go on Snopes, it's not hard to find out what is bullshit and what isn't.

Are you being serious or just playing devil's advocate? I seriously hope it's the latter.
Click to expand...

one site error doesn't account for two jumps of 200,000 and 138,339 in different states.

it will be proved. their system is wide open to abuse.

it will be replaced by a block chain system.

snopes is biased and bent. best ignored.

i don't expect you to believe a word of it but it will be proved.
 
originallambrettaman said:
There was no jump, some website in America that was tracking the results coming in accidentally typed in 153,710 votes in Shiawassee County, when it should have been 15,371 and Twitter went mad.

These conspiracy theories on irregular voting are complete bollocks being driven by Trump's mad ranting.
Click to expand...

time will tell.
 
x said:
one site error doesn't account for two jumps of 200,000 and 138,339 in different states.

it will be proved. their system is wide open to abuse.

it will be replaced by a block chain system.

snopes is biased and bent. best ignored.

i don't expect you to believe a word of it but it will be proved.
Click to expand...

Snopes is one of the very few places that isn't biased. <laugh>

But you do you.
 
x said:
there appear to have been increases of biden's count in two states by 200,000 and 138,000 without any changes to other totals. the sudden addition of over a hundred thousand votes to one candidate isn't 'basic maths'.
Click to expand...

The ballots are still being counted, they tend to announce them on in lumps anyway, so it's not really that strange. If they added each one at a time it would take forever.
 
Quill said:
Just noticed the first post of this thread.

Oh dear.
Click to expand...
Puts me in mind of the longest ever test match (cricket Eng v SAF). 9 days, then abandoned.

Nevada saying Nov 12 before they get all the postal votes in and counted.
 
Plum said:
Puts me in mind of the longest ever test match (cricket Eng v SAF). 9 days, then abandoned.

Nevada saying Nov 12 before they get all the postal votes in and counted.
Click to expand...

Usually, it takes weeks for all the votes to be counted, it's just a matter of working out when it is impossible for one to overtake another.
 
Quill said:
Usually, it takes weeks for all the votes to be counted, it's just a matter of working out when it is impossible for one to overtake another.
Click to expand...
Can't see Trump taking that if he's on the losing end.
 
x said:
there appear to have been increases of biden's count in two states by 200,000 and 138,000 without any changes to other totals. the sudden addition of over a hundred thousand votes to one candidate isn't 'basic maths'.
Click to expand...
Ahhh
You’re the person who believes stuff on the internet
 
Plum said:
Which he will with all the accompanying legal actions, demands for recounts, etc...
Click to expand...

Those will be relatively short lived legal battles if so.

He's already taken legal action against several states anyway.

Recounts he is perfectly fine in requesting - but I think he expects tens of thousands of votes to change, when usually it is rare for any recount to go over 4 figures.
 
Plum said:
Which he will with all the accompanying legal actions, demands for recounts, etc...
Click to expand...

A Michigan judge has dismissed the Trump campaign’s lawsuit demanding “meaningful access” to vote-counting sites.

It has another lawsuit pending in Nevada challenging the efficacy of signature-matching software, a case the Trump camp has already lost twice.

A Georgia judge has dismissed the Trump campaign’s lawsuit over absentee ballots in the state.
The president’s reelection campaign tried to argue election officials were attempting to count invalid ballots in Georgia.
When pressed for evidence of that claim, the Trump campaign could not produce any.

Yep, the lawsuits are going well so far.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Quill and Steven Toast
Asterix said:
A Michigan judge has dismissed the Trump campaign’s lawsuit demanding “meaningful access” to vote-counting sites.

It has another lawsuit pending in Nevada challenging the efficacy of signature-matching software, a case the Trump camp has already lost twice.

A Georgia judge has dismissed the Trump campaign’s lawsuit over absentee ballots in the state.
The president’s reelection campaign tried to argue election officials were attempting to count invalid ballots in Georgia.
When pressed for evidence of that claim, the Trump campaign could not produce any.

Yep, the lawsuits are going well so far.
Click to expand...
But you don't think he'll give up do you?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back