The younger generation will go with bravado because of Covid's strategic targeting, plus there is still no legislation for children under eleven regarding wearing masks, although they can carry a viral load up to 100 times that of an adult. We are stumbling in the dark.
This is not a satisfactory response. Nobody has used the word "rubbish". You have been asked to substantiate your claims. You claim to have invented a new form of science that allows you to make predictions with accuracy and now you say it's a hobby. If it doesn't have test data to back it up it's unproven and at best a theory. It's not unlike your argument that smoking is a barrier to Covid infection - you were asked to substantiate your statement but failed to do so. You have form for this - in 2017 you claimed on an Electric Vehicle forum to have invented an electric motor that was 60% more efficient that any other motor on the market but when pressed for information you disappeared. As someone posted there: Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence. So, again: is this new development in physics something tested repeatedly in rigorous conditions and found to be true, or just an idea that you have had?
People in this referenced thread were far less kind than people on this forum: https://www.diyelectriccar.com/thre...motion-over-unity-and-all-that.13449/page-101 and, to a lesser extent, this one: https://www.speakev.com/threads/revolutionary-electric-motor.32257/
Peter Hitchens commented on the malaria reference in his mail On Sunday column today but not the AIDS reference. There has been a surprising lack of response to this statement by Hancock.
There are plenty of other weirdo's posting stuff on the Internet that looks like nonsense, you don't have to stick with just one.
Sorry, but it's just posts I've made, there is no reply I can give except yes, I agree they were less kind. Or do you want me to say thank you to the members of this forum for being kinder than the ones on other forums?
Some perspective by a numbers guy on the radio this morning. If an age limit of 75 was imposed for live aid at Wembley, and a Covid bomb was dropped, one person would die. An average winter flu virus would kill three, such are the specifics of Covid. Edit: I didn't hear all the interview. Today it would be four deaths because of poorer health of the nation.
It could be stupidity fatigue on the part of many of the public. After Cummings and that Scottish MP woman, people aren't surprised anymore when Ministers say or do dumb things. None of them have much credibility left.
Hancock is leading from the front in the stupidity stakes. The man who lumps malaria and AIDS together with a virus. I am waiting for him to respond to allegations that he was drinking in the Commons bar after 10.
Yeah, she's done a job to be proud of. The gulf between her and some of the current government is abysmal.
The missus reminded me of another forum I used to post on, but it was a few years ago so you'll have to search the archives, personally I don't have the time or inclination to do so, but feel free to copy and paste whatever. https://www.scienceforums.net Once again, not much kindness, but if that gives you and others happiness, then that can only be a good thing. There is also a podcast on LBC from May 2017 about domestic violence. Once again you'll have to search, but it's worth a listen because of the level of hatred and violence I relive. The programs host asked me after the show if it was safe for me to return home. I replied, "No, but hopefully one day it will be" That one day was two years ago. Happy days.
Why suggest that I get pleasure from unkindness? I have been nothing less than civil to you at all times. You have made assertions on here which purport to be scientific and been asked, politely, to support them as proven science. In particular your assertion about smoking being a barrier to Covid and your Contra Physics theory which you claim gives you insight, but I would add your assertion that you have identified the cause of cancer. You constantly dodge the issue with verbiage. I have pointed out that you have a history of making unsupported assertions and that people who have challenged you elsewhere in the past have been less civil than myself and others here. Nothing more, nothing less. If you can back up any of the scientific claims you have made on here I will be happy to give due credit as, I am sure, will anybody else with any interest in the subjects of which you write, especially if they have a wider application for the good of humanity. But without proof the words are meaningless.
