Match Day Thread Rochdale v Hull City

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

City win?

  • City win

  • Rochdale cowboys quick on the draw

  • Rochdale win


Results are only viewable after voting.
Yeah, but the fact that in England, people have taken a neutral Romani word for 'boy' and used it as a slur, first against Romani people, then extended it as a negative stereotype, is why a lot of people find it offensive. Chav is on par with 'gyppo' and 'pikey'.

Romani people are pretty much one of the few people in England and Ireland where it's still socially acceptable by many to call them slurs and discriminate against them. Words like k*ke, n*gger, p*ki etc. raise eyebrows and it's considered extremely taboo to say them today but slurs against Romani people get said with ease.

It's not a word I've used, to be honest. We didn't get them on the mean streets of South Cave. They wouldn't have lasted five minutes in one of Rod Arnold's quizzes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Evington
I'll twist you York at home in the middle of the fabulous 1965/66 season when we were scoring goals for fun and all five forwards scored double figures, a 4-1 home loss followed by a 3-0 loss at QPR a couple of days later.
Beat me to it. I remembered the York game but couldn't remember who we played on the second match. Decent performance today - some nice football but finishing just a bit careless at times.
 
No, he'll just be a somewhat successful ****, like I said.

He will always be a ****. Unless he comes out and says he was wrong about those comments he made, he is a ****. No ifs or buts.

They were badly chosen words in the context, but there's a truth to them no matter how inappropriate given the circumstances.

I'm not going to pick him up over everything he says but what he delivers on the park.....

....and in that respect he's still a ****.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Quill
Yeah, but the fact that in England, people have taken a neutral Romani word for 'boy' and used it as a slur, first against Romani people, then extended it as a negative stereotype, is why a lot of people find it offensive. Chav is on par with 'gyppo' and 'pikey'.

Romani people are pretty much one of the few people in England and Ireland where it's still socially acceptable by many to call them slurs and discriminate against them. Words like k*ke, n*gger, p*ki etc. raise eyebrows and it's considered extremely taboo to say them today but slurs against Romani people get said with ease.

Get them to stop stealing hard working folks ****ing caravans then.

I've lost count of how many people I've dealt with or had reported to me that have spent their retirement pot on a brand new, twin axel brand new caravan (especially Hobby), with which to live their retirement dream, only to have all their tracking systems smashed out and security devices sawn off and their units towed off from secure compounds within weeks of their purchase.


I'll accept not all Traveller folk are like this.

I'll accept it's the minority.

I'll accept that insurance covers most of your loss.




But don't try to tell me that there aren't ****ers doing it.




Cos there are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kempton
In Hull it means, a blight on the community.

A mucky ****.

A loser.

A person who drinks 10% lager in the street.

A person who litters, even though there's a bin two ft away.

A waste of space.

A person who'll take any drug he can find, as long as its called drug.

A ****? No they don't have the intelligence for that.

I could go on for hours....

Anyone who gets upset that immigrants are ruining our country, needs to take a walk around Hull and its so easy to see who's causing the problem. It's English Chavs.

Delete post.

Along with the elite and the establishment. Are they the same people? Not sure they are.
 
Yeah, but the fact that in England, people have taken a neutral Romani word for 'boy' and used it as a slur, first against Romani people, then extended it as a negative stereotype, is why a lot of people find it offensive. Chav is on par with 'gyppo' and 'pikey'.

Romani people are pretty much one of the few people in England and Ireland where it's still socially acceptable by many to call them slurs and discriminate against them. Words like k*ke, n*gger, p*ki etc. raise eyebrows and it's considered extremely taboo to say them today but slurs against Romani people get said with ease.

Got to tell ya mate, I had no idea where the term came from and I suspect 95% of the UK's population don't either.

As for those other words you use, well I don't use them.

I was talking about what everyday people call a chav.

Call me uneducated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SW3 Chelsea Tiger
Got to tell ya mate, I had no idea where the term came from and I suspect 95% of the UK's population don't either.

As for those other words you use, well I don't use them.

I was talking about what everyday people call a chav.

Call me uneducated.

Yeah, I get that. I think my point is that anti-Roma sentiment is so ingrained in the British Isles that a word like 'chavi', a neutral or positive term in their own language, was used by non-Roma against them as a slur and then extended to have negative connotations regardless of ethnic origin. The root of calling someone a chav is 'you're so untrustworthy/criminal and uncouth, you're the same as a gypsy', which obviously has negative implications against Roma people themselves.

People saying it without realising its connotations is kinda my point, is what I'm getting at. It's not even a uniquely British or Irish thing, the way Roma are discriminated against in Romania and Hungary is far worse, for example.
 
People saying it without realising its connotations is kinda my point, is what I'm getting at. It's not even a uniquely British or Irish thing, the way Roma are discriminated against in Romania and Hungary is far worse, for example.

Bit patronising, n'est-ce pas?


Plenty of people understand the linguistic derivations of words.


You can't dismiss people's opinions by saying that they don't understand the origin or context.

What are you trying to achieve?
 
Bit patronising, n'est-ce pas?


Plenty of people understand the linguistic derivations of words.


You can't dismiss people's opinions by saying that they don't understand the origin or context.

What are you trying to achieve?

I was replying to Kempton, who admitted he didn't know where it originated from and said 95% of Brits probably wouldn't either. I didn't dismiss anyone's opinion. Point to where I did.

I'm saying that 'chav' is a slur, and because some Roma people commit crimes, it isn't an excuse to use slurs. Your own attitude of 'well, tell them to stop breaking into caravans and maybe they won't be discriminated against' is the same argument racists use against black people.
 
Yeah, I get that. I think my point is that anti-Roma sentiment is so ingrained in the British Isles that a word like 'chavi', a neutral or positive term in their own language, was used by non-Roma against them as a slur and then extended to have negative connotations regardless of ethnic origin. The root of calling someone a chav is 'you're so untrustworthy/criminal and uncouth, you're the same as a gypsy', which obviously has negative implications against Roma people themselves.

People saying it without realising its connotations is kinda my point, is what I'm getting at. It's not even a uniquely British or Irish thing, the way Roma are discriminated against in Romania and Hungary is far worse, for example.
For ****s sake do we really have to have this ****e on this forum!
It’s almost ****ing vegan!
 
Your own attitude of 'well, tell them to stop breaking into caravans and maybe they won't be discriminated against' is the same argument racists use against black people.

Wow, this escalated! <laugh><laugh><laugh>


What I said was;

I'll accept not all Traveller folk are like this.

I'll accept it's the minority.


And it's not breaking into caravans, it's stealing them.


30 grand they cost.

And the evidence is conclusive as to who is committing these crimes.


Not actually sure what your point is.

Ignoring facts though is rarely a good idea.
 
Wow, this escalated! <laugh><laugh><laugh>


What I said was;

I'll accept not all Traveller folk are like this.

I'll accept it's the minority.


And it's not breaking into caravans, it's stealing them.


30 grand they cost.

And the evidence is conclusive as to who is committing these crimes.


Not actually sure what your point is.

Ignoring facts though is rarely a good idea.

Not sure what your point is. Why bring it up if it's just a minority?