Match Day Thread General matchday thread.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
The same reason why anyone else with common sense has no time for the waste of blood and organs: because he's a sad twat who thinks he's something other than a sad twat

He wanted to start some ****, so let him cry when he gets told to **** off

Don't sound like the Treble I know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
I always thought it was Charlie not Bertie tbf. Maybe that's a London ting, full of Berties?

Seriously now, is it true you're all giving up on football on the spuds board? If so, I'll need to chalk that up to number 982539o272o times you lot have in the last year like <laugh>
And this is why nobody is interested in what you think

If you want to cry because your attempt at being a WUM got your backside handed to you, there's a nice, quiet safe space for you where nobody else will hurt your feelings. Here, I'll post a link for you...
https://not606.com/forums/manchester-united.23/
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sucky
The same reason why anyone else with common sense has no time for the waste of blood and organs: because he's a sad twat who thinks he's something other than a sad twat

He wanted to start some ****, so let him cry when he gets told to **** off

I have to say mate, you've had a **** result and you're taking it rather well.

<laugh>
 
Very true mate, like you would have drawn 2-2 with City without the fouls for penalty's <ok>

... annnnnnd ... back to my point ... we'd have had 3 shots at the keeper one on one, denied by taking the forward our ... any of which might have resulted in goals ... the handballs did not deny scoring opportunities... thank you for helping to prove the point <ok>
 
If you believe the handball rule isn't a complete farce right now, your username is 100% suitable

Also, just in case you spout self-pitying gibberish in future, let me make something clear to you: the takeover bid wasn't denied, the group took their ball and went home because the bid wasn't accepted on an arbitrary timetable of their choosing, and at no point was it rejected


Wrong
 
Funny thing is, there's some frayed tempers and nerves here tonight but we all agree the current rule is terrible.

Don't let that get in the way of disagreement though, this is more entertaining than most of the football.

Yeh no doubt it's absolutely fcking stupid, we can all see it.

The thing is the overreaction by certain sets of fans which is prize gold.... usually the ones in London <laugh>
 
Why show me a pic that looks anything but a penalty then try to look clever by saying i am wrong?

Was the handball in the CL final against Liverpool a penalty by normal rules?
At the time, no it wasn't. They changed the rules for the 2020-21 season, and as anyone who knows how the passage of time works the 2019 Champions League final took place in the 2018-19 season

It's pretty straightforward stuff, Diego, really it is
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sucky
... annnnnnd ... back to my point ... we'd have had 3 shots at the keeper one on one, denied by taking the forward our ... any of which might have resulted in goals ... the handballs did not deny scoring opportunities... thank you for helping to prove the point <ok>
FFS watch some games, Maguires header was going toward the goal, it hit an out-stretched arm and was deflected toward a defender on the line who cleared it.
There was as much chance of a goal as your players running through on the keeper, i have seen the keeper come out on top many many times.