Fans to return...

Huh?
You were talking about people apparently being told by employers to get tested so they can go back to work
I just pointed out that if that was the case then the employers haven’t read or understood what the rules are.
I know several people who have rigidly followed the rules, but that’s not relevant either. I was making the point about employers not holidaymakers

 

That can be resolved if Chazz was put in isolation though...

 

I'm full of mirth responding to meaningless posts from the likes of yourself. Usually the insulting rebound response is a fob off show of ignorance and inability to substantiate/explain that meaningless post.

 

I will try to explain. Hull has less cases of proven Covid 19 then it has cases of syphilis. I typed that slowly so you could understand it.

 

I will simplify the question to stick to the issue.
Is the rate of infection of syphilis cases greater in the last week than the rate of Covid infection over the same period?

 

Does it really matter ?
You know what ? I couldn't care less. As I posted earlier, lighten up, City won, that's three wins in a week.
And the answer to your question is yes, and that's just on Bransholme. The Garths.

 

Nothing matters.

 

A mask won't protect you from syphilis but it could keep the CSA off your back.

 

Depends how you were planning to catch it...

 

On a Hull City football forum the fact that we have won three games in a week does.

 

Is CSA another STD?

 

Subscriber Trunk Dialling? Some of us remember when long distance calls, ie anything outside of a few miles, had to go through the operator.

 

So that's what you thought you had? It was NSU.

 

Was it a RO 80

 

Just read his reply and immediately thought about Cream's tribute to the National Students Union as well.

 

I mean I’m happy for this to go off topic......

 

Is the rate of infection of syphilis doubling or tripling every week?

it’s exponential maths. Even if you start from a low number, if you keep doubling or tripling every week then we’ll then be at a big number of cases soon. Look at the graphs on the bbc, the shape of the curve for hospitalisations is beginning to tick up again, like it did in Feb/March.

whether that’s enough to refuse permission for the trial at the KCOM is another debate, but if the decision was taken solely on increase in infection rate I can see why they came to that conclusion.

 

Really... anyone can tell...

 

It would be interesting to know by way of comparison what the infection rates are in the places where people were allowed in.